Re: XLibre in Debian

Phil Wyett <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.debian.devel.project
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Thu, 2025-10-02 at 17:02 -0700, Soren Stoutner wrote:
> Gonidec wrote:
> > Le Thu, Oct 02, 2025 at 01:24:48PM -0700, Soren Stoutner a écrit :
> > > (…) I am not accustomed to Debian categorically rejecting software
> > > that is DFSG-free from inclusion based solely on the team that
> > > develops
> it.
> > 
> > To avoid confusion: I gave *my* opinion. My opinion as a Debian
> > Developer, but still I am not Debian by myself.
> > 
> > As for why I strongly oppose the inclusion of this software into
> > Debian,
> > I won’t go into details so suffice to say that I am not willing to let
> > Debian become a Nazi bar.
> > 
> > If you’re surprised by the use of such words, I suggest looking up why
> > other distributions already rejected XLibre. I for myself do not have
> > the energy (nor the will) to spend more time on XLibre than I already
> > did writing the current e-mail.
> 
> Like I said, I know nothing about XLibre or its history.  But I think it
> is
> important to state here that I am categorically opposed to any software
> being
> excluded from Debian because of the politics of the developers (as long
> as
> those politics are not included in the software itself).
> 
> Excluding software because of the politics of the developers is both
> extremely
> dangerous and contrary to the spirit of the DFSG #5:
> 
> "No Discrimination Against Persons or Groups”
> 
> Also, I am not saying that Debian should accept any software that is
> below its
> technical standards (an argument that nobody has yet made regarding
> XLibre). 
> However, based on what has been expressed so far in this thread, I would
> be
> opposed to anyone preventing *someone else* from packaging this for
> Debian if
> they so desired.  Perhaps there are further details about the developers
> that
> would change my mind, but if that is the case those details would need to
> be
> clearly explained.
> 

Hi Soren and all,

Very close to my thoughts on this subject. Let us concentrate on technical
standards and the spirit of Debian and the DFSG.

Regards

Phil

-- 

Independent Free/Open Source Contributor.

Not affiliated with any GNU Linux Distribution.

--

Blog: https://blog.kathenas.org

Instagram: https://instagram.com/kathenasorg

Buy Me A Coffee: https://buymeacoffee.com/kathenasorg
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 870 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=HZh8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.