Re: Debian - Release Cadence Options

<[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.debian.devel.project
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Sat, Oct 18, 2025 at 12:17:53AM +0200, Antoine Le Gonidec wrote:
> Le Fri, Oct 17, 2025 at 09:49:20AM -0700, Russ Allbery a écrit :
> > Greg McPherran <[email protected]> writes:
> > > I am considering using unstable, and would be happy to provide feedback
> > > on any findings. If someone could point me to the best contact for such
> > > feedback, so that I may be helpful, I would be grateful.
> > (…)
> > I would recommend testing over unstable unless you're very familiar with
> > Linux and comfortable with your ability to roll back to previous kernels,
> > downgrade and pin packages, and fix weird problems. Unstable doesn't break
> > that often, but it is prone to more low-level breakage than testing is.
> 
> And I would recommend unstable over testing, for security reasons, less
> risks of packages disappearing, and bugs actually being fixed in a
> timely manner.
> 
> In my 15 years of user support, a huge majority of reported problems
> were with testing. But the sample might be biased by testing being the
> one chosen by less experienced users, wrongly thinking it would be some
> kind of middle ground between stable and unstable.

In a way, it is: when packages land in testing they have passed through
a rough first test. So in a way, you get less surprises in testing.

In some other way... it's the other way around: packages "disappear" from
testing when some bigger issue is found, but they stay on stable. Plus,
since both don't have a security policy, security issues get (arguably)
fixed faster on testing.

If you (try to) install packages from a future suite (FrankenDebian),
then testing is more often the better bet. If you run a future suite
wholesale, the situation is not so clear. The difference to a rolling
release is that in the latter case, more effort is put to avoid
breakage.

Cheers
-- 
tomás
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 195 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iF0EABECAB0WIQRp53liolZD6iXhAoIFyCz1etHaRgUCaPL6BAAKCRAFyCz1etHa
RvpaAJsGKhoINMd1fukvxowVcX0IKhK+RwCfTZFN68CXJzPfJBvv2PFgDn6pWWw=
=FEVP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.