Re: Debian - Release Cadence Options
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.devel.project |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <aPOe6/[email protected]> |
On Sat, Oct 18, 2025 at 02:24:40PM +0200, Antoine Le Gonidec wrote: > Le Sat, Oct 18, 2025 at 04:23:07AM +0200, [email protected] a écrit : > > (…) Plus, > > since both don't have a security policy, security issues get (arguably) > > fixed faster on testing. Uh... sorry. I wanted to write unstable :-/ > Beware, if you’re talking unstable vs. testing here, testing is the one > with the worst security support (= none at all) of all Debian branches. Yes. That's what I meant to write, sorry. > Security fixes are provided in unstable as part of packaging new > upstream releases, and cherry-picked to stable through the dedicated > security channel. On testing, security fixes do not go through a special > channel: they trickle down from unstable following the usual rules, so > with at least a 3 to 5 days delay that can grow to weeks or even months if > you’re unlucky. 100% agree :-) Cheers -- t
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 195 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iF0EABECAB0WIQRp53liolZD6iXhAoIFyCz1etHaRgUCaPOe4wAKCRAFyCz1etHa RunkAJ9zLme9OVsbfKlFWrFVeKd+CpBYfACeLHWzSXGhYmW4GAd8maZYgAb/U2A= =6umX -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----