Re: is copyleft packaging bad for Debian?
Mechtilde Stehmann <[email protected]> Sat, 31 Jan 2026 17:18:13 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.devel.project |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
. > > Imagine a proposal was made to extend Debian Policy with a rule, that > packaging must be upstreamable - i.e. that packages licensed more > strictly free than that of the contained project must be *rejected* at > the NEW queue screening, and packages already in the archive with such > "too strictly free" licensing should¹ be either corrected or dropped. > > Would you vote for or against such a proposal? +1 for this -- Mechtilde Stehmann ## Debian Developer ## PGP encryption welcome ## F0E3 7F3D C87A 4998 2899 39E7 F287 7BBA 141A AD7F
OpenPGP_signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 833 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEE8ON/Pch6SZgomTnn8od7uhQarX8FAml+K0YACgkQ8od7uhQa rX8mdxAAlVh3Md4v8ERrGKztG32lq0et2RjFrSzBnmAp58dTezEsCKb1EfByWvhO c7QYSupIGrw/5pShQfLPJDS1YXVCE0ZU1Iu02RZsahnKEfDfgAQfC0GPb+USYLxz HloFEOOA7j/W97z49YdCDnWX2M83VmDF8xF8MNmJ8OL0lQNQ4dJ5U2Qx/9vpcIG0 dRMiXLoBuYAApcquahYrrIeu8HTjmHnCCBLeJPi3UaXKMJnZlSxeiHMmLkFWRWhF HXbABw+GJx0vKwbwZRlnRiaUK8/a52GgNCNfz+jOiWeYuDJRK0k1w5ZSyRK6ofi/ mtcZowUTJ701mVcDwFwiVDfH2GJ+82QVhen/r5JfqieTTPNxQzy4asU64z4uyTFZ akdPdjl7vvNp+yMl4Bg/lVGJdZoWIUbxhN9wjkSqZLpFFKeFEbEcWNJuMWACvXJ5 KYU7yMXFbCrbrP8yfLQnADZ9KFJiu9yXPZLbgHWlfVsrve6Q6dMzyjWYjd1WfSLH 7wHUzcXMcRb2jQxr/lX3G6w36V2rP/IG3r68UktEH1OiDYvIpUuid2LOXkE6cMK9 wWQrHhjXuTqXKKoKiJzBzNGVRik1h4SxN24onMOB9OKoVeunYIeeCIC4poT8WDCq DJ0nhXW9bigHJFO1RThAeNqhlUtYkfL8bWI7c8Ek0882/FBJHD0= =m0tK -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----