Is Packaging Copyrightable (was: is copyleft packaging bad for Debian?)

Soren Stoutner <[email protected]> Mon, 02 Feb 2026 12:04:57 -0700
Newsgroups gmane.linux.debian.devel.project
Organization Debian
Message-ID <3544978.irdbgypaU6@soren-desktop>
On Monday, February 2, 2026 11:43:34 AM Mountain Standard Time Jonas 
Smedegaard wrote:
> Related to that, I now (since yesterday) add the following section to
> the debian/copyright file of packages that I maintain:
> 
> Files: debian/patches/*
> Copyright: None
> License: None
> Comment:
>  Patches are generally assumed not copyright-protected by default.
>  Please list any patch with copyright claims separately.

As I just wrote in a separate email, I disagree strongly with the idea that 
Debian packaging is not copyrightable.  I do not think that any packages with 
the above debian/copyright entry should be allowed in Debian.

-- 
Soren Stoutner
[email protected]
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 833 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=ty6r
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----