Is Packaging Copyrightable (was: is copyleft packaging bad for Debian?)
Soren Stoutner <[email protected]> Mon, 02 Feb 2026 12:04:57 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.devel.project |
|---|---|
| Organization | Debian |
| Message-ID | <3544978.irdbgypaU6@soren-desktop> |
On Monday, February 2, 2026 11:43:34 AM Mountain Standard Time Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > Related to that, I now (since yesterday) add the following section to > the debian/copyright file of packages that I maintain: > > Files: debian/patches/* > Copyright: None > License: None > Comment: > Patches are generally assumed not copyright-protected by default. > Please list any patch with copyright claims separately. As I just wrote in a separate email, I disagree strongly with the idea that Debian packaging is not copyrightable. I do not think that any packages with the above debian/copyright entry should be allowed in Debian. -- Soren Stoutner [email protected]
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 833 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEJKVN2yNUZnlcqOI+wufLJ66wtgMFAmmA9VkACgkQwufLJ66w tgMnzxAAsNQbAyQawWSsBSu3J2fPBco0fZwaZ34u9gRA0gwBsFWi/029m7c/7KPx w0YCJWus77WRY+u55I7PRQNWidHpwldDkj0HJrpSc0fYHoNH9bKGyWqmoncyP7+6 KzxDChVpJfVSgBfjr/QbxhP5TdNS38JnluK04xM2KGAw9uYIYKlf3dqXuWPsHzLh Xx/qIhFHmhv0R2ZbpUU0wnssrPvirRaljR7vcV7jiRdH+R80DTQXhQC5wReXEMYQ 6MTqB781AfBVBmNOLAnGa5Kw4kMpYIRbV4OR84TF2oQ6gXFHzM8JkZVE1Ju2MDwy Bs0utvp2Fk3SByKch3qZ7zqQ4y3zwycUNBn2a/WLRYMPzSTL5txyDEz9O8MY2hNA w/TbD+h/Q3UjJiUm8a4uKw7GWwXUGPs0WPPYN4DtMEgFqs6qxSBmyjDCC2Sx+T3p U5Q60gj5ijJjJV884pDh0QAYu1LSYywp12t/zjgt/gdL3LaiaeRiKA/xuByT3pC4 BJCrWgU/hynUWDFgu06EteWiyV0JjN/2VsZ4IKIIuf7ETZJ0kkm9ipuSGbmbLOcR AAlEl1jXwjElvDCVi0wBHhDAVqF7WfQxi6k3gN2WTSzcWwL5QcAFgztnbrfQgV1a DHH/wHTyDLymsa7BEll2eR85lEZ/vT4UCmHmNg7ZG8gwZpSD6FE= =ty6r -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----