Re: unmaintained packages hidden by team maintenance (was Re: Bits from the DPL)
Sean Whitton <[email protected]> Sun, 08 Feb 2026 12:54:41 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.devel.project |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hello, Russ Allbery [07/Feb 9:28am -08] wrote: > I am increasingly inclined to remove the requirement that Uploaders be > present for team-maintained packages, though. My vague recollection is > that the last time this came up, the FTP team raised the primary > objections on the grounds that they needed someone specific to contact if > there was a problem with a package. But I'm not sure this still makes > sense (this was many years ago), and the correct contact point for nearly > all purposes I can think of is indeed the team. No, it was the MIA team who were opposed to us making that change, nothing to do with the FTP team. Their workflow would have been broken by the change and they weren't happy with the alternatives. -- Sean Whitton
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 869 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQJNBAEBCgA3FiEEm5FwB64DDjbk/CSLaVt65L8GYkAFAmmIh5EZHHNwd2hpdHRv bkBzcHdoaXR0b24ubmFtZQAKCRBpW3rkvwZiQE1eEACtHKHWfGMdH5REpyB0duRj pSBHVpj1CTTo5lEgYM8R+QZmlyG0a5IZahD+h3GopeWcUS1XkPCL+2/V/4FRKNFy L7ZX+pnGgfE0k0zrXW89lRSelt/MRtEm5oRQEb/CfZFp1/NcuI9eNeRWegeSr5s4 VuHnikQQpJ/oAOfW5sRmJxBPpVWP6ylBM/+KMOVWUJmzVXn9SFyauDiA+7EXDMIq 7EbdcJu0DB6xW3OKSynQjqKqCanpTAGXyC0jzn/qWwv0tjaJdeP7d1QDQP7XiUgX sq4spjQZEC4OgZs5epqcW2ANGnjrnzvvzbD1uEJbM8RcGak0CcGRphJHxVVzKztk xir/jHMZeM31ARoJ7PvOsZH9WF4HgpElUEW1CQmY3DdiA92ZSJigNVqJazfWB/gM lkhFIFZ4adN2CzVLdTzkzsEwgNdu99a6ql49gTWhr7mJ/uWBo3fbsJGn4ISBdF8q 5yPrQuqCNCsVu9cvMEBTuYUqJPd7Mn8WW93M7LLyAY3BjsAVwl5DZXo/CcYVzKZh sIkTdVDCgWd99wxfjTW7l1zsVXciCDf9cp7EdVsqu43DG2eE+Fj5WTZDOHFouOsU O+1y/a1sa+XG41ZypLbYae6kDIbN2a6Foi6iRp7Gon5pDi0D/vNgftX82joPPwmB 912nrYQ0dhC1D5AFQiGlcQ== =Q7hD -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----