Re: Debian Certified Laptops -- Possibility of collaborating with Framework?
<[email protected]> Mon, 27 Apr 2026 11:00:24 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.devel.project |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
--2tEUlOSBVO80j1P1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Apr 27, 2026 at 10:43:47AM +0200, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote: > * Martin <[email protected]> [260427 10:22]: > > On 2026-04-27 10:02, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote: > > > * Aryan Karamtoth <[email protected]> [260425 11:52]: > > > > We could work with Framework and [..] > > >=20 > > > https://www.theregister.com/2025/10/14/framework_linux_controversy/ > >=20 > > Yes, but... Debian collaborates with far worse companies than Framework. >=20 > If you make this argument, could you also name them? This so we can stop > collaborating with such people? I can find a couple here [1] who will say "neutrality" any day to better their bottom line. Don't get me wrong, but, having read the article, I get the feeling that Framework misjudged, miscommunicated, but is still willing to engage in the discussion: this is far better than the cookie-cutter response from the PR dept. you'd get from most other companies. I'd rather see folks here lambasting Google, for example. Cheers --=20 t --2tEUlOSBVO80j1P1 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iF0EABECAB0WIQRp53liolZD6iXhAoIFyCz1etHaRgUCae8loQAKCRAFyCz1etHa Ro8KAJ9ZEqVJjqup0DZWOXBCVxJKV2WH/QCfSigw9YVzgRBXt8/oDHgXq/UwjgY= =VSos -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --2tEUlOSBVO80j1P1--