Re: Debian Certified Laptops -- Possibility of collaborating with Framework?

Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues <[email protected]> Tue, 28 Apr 2026 13:38:36 +0200
Newsgroups gmane.linux.debian.devel.project
Message-ID <177737631697.4757.17775989020758475217@localhost>
--===============3918498868624418263==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Quoting nick black (2026-04-28 10:12:46)
> Matthias Geiger left as an exercise for the reader:
> > Unfortunately the main devs of both hyprland and omarchy are holding
> > views/values very detrimental to Debian, and the surrounding community =
does
> > not care to be supporting / tolerating those.
>=20
> it seems very odd to me that we're casting aspersions on an=20
> organization for supporting a project which *we package and=20
> ship* (and many people, myself included, use). i hardly find=20
> that a coherent position. if this is to be some litmus, let's=20
> start with removing the software from the debian archives (which, again,
> please don't; it's my compositor of choice).

If we had to make a public statement about why Debian is okay with shipping
hyprland I doubt that such a statement would include that we are welcoming
those people who want to see some of our members gone or would be fine with
harassment and trolling. When Framework was asked about a clarification abo=
ut
*why* they are okay with funding hyprland they could've said that they stand
for diversity and respectful interaction and that they do explicitly *not*
endorse what some important figures in the hyprland community are known for.
But that's not what they did. Instead, they doubled down and explained that
they follow the "big tent" approach, meaning that they even invite those pe=
ople
who want to see others out. [1]

I don't like Framework for supporting hyprland because of the people behind
that software. But I like them even less for then doubling down and even be=
ing
explicitly welcoming to people who we would very likely and for good reason=
 not
tolerate as part of the Debian project. And *that* would be my main argument
against Debian collaborating with them. That's what I meant in my other mail
when I said:

> Framework made it very clear that their tent is big enough for even those
> people who would rather see this world be less diverse.

Now this thread has the link to the relevant forum post of theirs.

Thanks!

cheers, josch

[1] https://community.frame.work/t/75986/2
--===============3918498868624418263==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Description: signature
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"; charset="us-ascii"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=6iAN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--===============3918498868624418263==--