Re: Debian should not link to n*zis nor ship their software (Re: Debian Certified Laptops -- Possibility of collaborating with Framework?
Simon Josefsson <[email protected]> Thu, 14 May 2026 12:13:27 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.devel.project |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
--=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Dominik George <[email protected]> writes: > Hi, > >>tech-ctte rules on *technical* issues, so this doesn't really seem >>within their mandate. And the community team has no powers on the >>contents of packages. > > It occurred to me, on several occasions, that noone in Debian (short > of its members via a GR) is responsible for overseeing the Social > Contract. Maybe with all the topics of these days (AI and its > consequences, facsism,=E2=80=A6), it's time for some sort of ethical coun= cil, > and for updating the Social Contract? I think this issue is somewhat similar to the advertisement concern with gnome-control-center: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D1136336 In both packages, there is no real clear guidance from Debian Policies what is deemed to be acceptable contents within a package. It seems both these issues could be helped by better guidance on matters of acceptable package content. Personally, I would find it really problematic if we would have a hard policy to filter packages depending on political, religious, philosophical etc views of the upstream author. That's a slippery slope to motivate excluding just about anything, depending on your own political/religious/philosophical/etc preferences. That said, I also have sympathy with the goal to shepherd an inclusive and friendly atmosphere and Operating System that promotes the spirit of the DSC/DFSG. Having a package that display a really provocative message to the user inside Debian seems problematic and warrant discussion and possibly some action. Maybe we don't need to bike-shed the engineering approach to social concerns by defining a rigid policy document. Social issues cannot always be resolved by technical procedures. Thus, I propose to write down some guiding principle on this, with examples of clearly offensive content that maintainers should be patching out. It doesn't have to be a hard policy, but a guiding principle around a complex social topic. Such a document would encourage good social behaviour, and maybe we could have a committe that guide maintainers on these matters is useful as a escalation point different to the tech-ctte. FWIW, Petter did patch out the offensive messages here, which seems somewhat reasonable. Dropping the Homepage URL may be warranted in this situation too, but it could also be an over-reaction that is counter-productive for end-users. Repacking the upstream source code without the offensive message could be done, but also has negative consequences for auditing costs and maintainance. /Simon --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQNoBAEWCgMQFiEEo8ychwudMQq61M8vUXIrCP5HRaIFAmoFoEcUHHNpbW9uQGpv c2Vmc3Nvbi5vcmfCHCYAmDMEXJLOtBYJKwYBBAHaRw8BAQdACIcrZIvhrxDBkK9f V+QlTmXxo2naObDuGtw58YaxlOu0JVNpbW9uIEpvc2Vmc3NvbiA8c2ltb25Aam9z ZWZzc29uLm9yZz6IlgQTFggAPgIbAwULCQgHAgYVCAkKCwIEFgIDAQIeAQIXgBYh BLHSvRN1vst4TPT4xNc89jjFPAa+BQJp4fWRBQkOa+rdAAoJENc89jjFPAa+hWIA /1lQvrJeGlQq50lP6tm99D1zDy7J1tQ3ha4x0Jx7rkFTAP9hpUKuTvm6m1fXyiZV YZlu2+Id/Dq3CIAZvNF+XEr2BLgzBFySz4EWCSsGAQQB2kcPAQEHQOxTCIOaeXAx I2hIX4HK9bQTpNVei708oNr1Klm8qCGKiPUEGBYIACYCGwIWIQSx0r0Tdb7LeEz0 +MTXPPY4xTwGvgUCaeCW1wUJDmqLVgCBdiAEGRYIAB0WIQSjzJyHC50xCrrUzy9R cisI/kdFogUCXJLPgQAKCRBRcisI/kdFoqdMAQCgH45aseZgIrwKOvUOA9QfsmeE 8GZHYNuFHmM9FEQS6AD6A4x5aYvoY6lo98pgtw2HPDhmcCXFItjXCrV4A0GmJA4J ENc89jjFPAa+s7AA+gIIHpBApDpcDj1sKhzDngmpvwQf0VkHme6s+EG7qSgpAQDe /XMrU0c0Pa3ji85cMqZhvzJOFI/soe662lzL0QY3Bbg4BFySz2oSCisGAQQBl1UB BQEBB0AxlRumDW6nZY7A+VCfek9VpEx6PJmdJyYPt3lNHMd6HAMBCAeIfgQYFggA JgIbDBYhBLHSvRN1vst4TPT4xNc89jjFPAa+BQJp4JbXBQkOaottAAoJENc89jjF PAa+RNUA/2faQO/nFT06E+MlhlQdo/0chlQXC5TZMPTVvVBFwoLOAP9xLJK0ow5E jTzYJB4K810AL/Iv6PEOAEgA4cPTHVlbCQAKCRBRcisI/kdFotjBAQCI/f9AeNMk YNwUWqnpXl4Kgc4G/UGJNZNHHb+ruDBJeAD9HNn6m++Zb+XbrPRfJLqYJEouK6pW AHCailJ6yn3fDQI= =whny -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--