Re: Debian should not link to n*zis nor ship their software (Re: Debian Certified Laptops -- Possibility of collaborating with Framework?

Matthias Geiger wrote:
> Well, the DFSG exits, we just don't have it mandating actions for package=
s (which IMO should be discussed).
>
> I'd like to point out =C2=A75 here [1].

DFSG =C2=A75 concerns the *license* of the program. "No Discrimination"
here means that the license must not restrict any person or group from
using, modifying and redistributing the program. It doesn't concern
discriminatory views held by the *authors* of the program.

About "mandating actions for packages", I understand that DFSG
violation bugs are RC. You aren't "forced" to do anything (see also
Constitution 2.1.1) but if you don't, your package won't be part of a
Debian stable release.
But this is not a case of DFSG violation.

Gerardo