Re: Should we have a debian-network mailing list?
Matthias Geiger <[email protected]> Thu, 28 May 2026 12:28:11 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.devel.project |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
This is a MIME formatted message with attachments. Use a MIME-compliant client to view it properly. --bzz_bzz__bzz__2nn9zeo19tw3mtfqt6ddluje0zwehfc Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed On Thu, 28 May 2026 09:11, Marc Haber <[email protected]> wrote: >Hi, > >networking has always been an important part of building a Linux >distribution, and nowadays in the world of VMs and containers and many >different ways to bring up a network this is a constant cause of >friction between packages. the different ways of building firewalls >plays a big role. > >otoh, we do not have a general mailing list for network issues. We have >debian-ipv6 and debian-firewall, the latter not having had ontopic >traffic since 2022. > >Should we have a debian-network mailing list? Or is the networking topic >so important that network issues should be discussed on debian-devel >proper? > Should this only discuss technical decisions, or also provide user support? >Independently of this decision, is it time now to sunset the >debian-ipv6 and the debian-firewall mailing list due to the low >traffic? Both ipv6 and firewalls are no longer a corner topic inside >networking, both topics have become intrinsic part of networking in >Linux. > Seems sensible to me. best, werdahias --bzz_bzz__bzz__2nn9zeo19tw3mtfqt6ddluje0zwehfc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; charset="utf-8"; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHUEABYKAB0WIQQUWTv/Sl6/b+DpcW7svtu2B7myvgUCahgZLgAKCRDsvtu2B7my vnpQAQCYSMM78zRXJLR/0QUWslb0vwhTZxu+53jS4NTDDdhY/gD/dVD8527es+au 4Snv9UftmqoaBZIbaavBaZVSvv0JZwo= =o7fB -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --bzz_bzz__bzz__2nn9zeo19tw3mtfqt6ddluje0zwehfc--