Re: Freexian, security and Debian
Simon Josefsson <[email protected]> Wed, 22 Jul 2026 17:08:55 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.devel.project |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
--=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Lucas Nussbaum <[email protected]> writes: > Hi, > > On 19/07/26 at 19:57 +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote: >> 2. Debusine, and Freexian in general >> ------------------------------------ >>=20 >> While it is laudable that Freexian has the explicit goal of helping=20 >> Debian, Debian giving preferential treatment to one company might >> outweigh the benefits when this drives away other contributors. > > A long time ago, I was the DPL when Debian LTS was set up. > > I was very careful at the time to defend a setup where mutiple actors > could collaborate on Debian LTS. I think that this still holds: if > someone if sufficiently unhappy with Freexian's contributions to LTS, > there's space to setup other actors, with their own funding models. Would that even be possible if Debian buildds were to use Debusine? Doing so seems like a corporate-takeover of an essential Debian-internal service. I guess the close association between Debian-internal matters (e.g., LTS or buildd) with one external company is what may annoy people. It calls for transparency. Don't get me wrong: in this particular case, I'm for replacing our aging buildd infrastructure with Debusine which is well documented and appears on the surface to be better engineered. I don't have anything per se against corporate takeovers, and find that they often lead to more activity and progress, which is good. But we should be aware of what we are doing. /Simon --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQNoBAEWCgMQFiEEo8ychwudMQq61M8vUXIrCP5HRaIFAmpg3QcUHHNpbW9uQGpv c2Vmc3Nvbi5vcmfCHCYAmDMEXJLOtBYJKwYBBAHaRw8BAQdACIcrZIvhrxDBkK9f V+QlTmXxo2naObDuGtw58YaxlOu0JVNpbW9uIEpvc2Vmc3NvbiA8c2ltb25Aam9z ZWZzc29uLm9yZz6IlgQTFggAPgIbAwULCQgHAgYVCAkKCwIEFgIDAQIeAQIXgBYh BLHSvRN1vst4TPT4xNc89jjFPAa+BQJp4fWRBQkOa+rdAAoJENc89jjFPAa+hWIA /1lQvrJeGlQq50lP6tm99D1zDy7J1tQ3ha4x0Jx7rkFTAP9hpUKuTvm6m1fXyiZV YZlu2+Id/Dq3CIAZvNF+XEr2BLgzBFySz4EWCSsGAQQB2kcPAQEHQOxTCIOaeXAx I2hIX4HK9bQTpNVei708oNr1Klm8qCGKiPUEGBYIACYCGwIWIQSx0r0Tdb7LeEz0 +MTXPPY4xTwGvgUCaeCW1wUJDmqLVgCBdiAEGRYIAB0WIQSjzJyHC50xCrrUzy9R cisI/kdFogUCXJLPgQAKCRBRcisI/kdFoqdMAQCgH45aseZgIrwKOvUOA9QfsmeE 8GZHYNuFHmM9FEQS6AD6A4x5aYvoY6lo98pgtw2HPDhmcCXFItjXCrV4A0GmJA4J ENc89jjFPAa+s7AA+gIIHpBApDpcDj1sKhzDngmpvwQf0VkHme6s+EG7qSgpAQDe /XMrU0c0Pa3ji85cMqZhvzJOFI/soe662lzL0QY3Bbg4BFySz2oSCisGAQQBl1UB BQEBB0AxlRumDW6nZY7A+VCfek9VpEx6PJmdJyYPt3lNHMd6HAMBCAeIfgQYFggA JgIbDBYhBLHSvRN1vst4TPT4xNc89jjFPAa+BQJp4JbXBQkOaottAAoJENc89jjF PAa+RNUA/2faQO/nFT06E+MlhlQdo/0chlQXC5TZMPTVvVBFwoLOAP9xLJK0ow5E jTzYJB4K810AL/Iv6PEOAEgA4cPTHVlbCQAKCRBRcisI/kdFoqs2AQC4V0Fx4PWI JYF6kyUsMT2ggEfAmlO1DCP8qCG7Ge+t1QD+IDwn5mYs9iF3pi6Dd3fanWERwi+L dIbKZAKwWjRTywA= =1Nk9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--