Re: Beyond QA: Uploaders field hygiene
Sebastiaan Couwenberg <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.devel.project |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 8/15/26 1:20 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > Quoting Tobias Frost (2026-08-15 10:25:18) >> One final clarification: this mail is not intended to reopen the >> broader discussion about the usefulness or future of the Uploaders >> field. That is a separate discussion, and this is not the place to >> have it. > > Quoting Sebastiaan Couwenberg (2026-08-15 12:41:27) >> On 8/15/26 12:10 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: >>> Quoting Sebastiaan Couwenberg (2026-08-15 11:07:03) >>>> On 8/15/26 10:25 AM, Tobias Frost wrote: >>>>> But this is not just an MIA team task. The Uploaders field is part of >>>>> the package's maintenance metadata, and keeping it reasonably accurate >>>>> should be part of maintaining the package. If you notice that someone >>>>> listed there no longer appears to be actively maintaining the package, >>>>> please consider cleaning it up. >>>> >>>> This will result in no-human-maintainers lintian issues, because many packages are on life support with team uploads where no person wants to commit to the package by adding themselves to Uploaders. >>>> >>>> I guess we should just acknowledge that fact in the override comment. >>> >>> If noone in a team wants to commit to a package by adding themselves as >>> in the Uploaders field, it seems that package is team-*un*maintained >>> and that fact should be acknowledged by moving the package to QA team. >> >> The package is still team maintained, new upstream releases get packaged and bugs get triaged, but only the minimum amount of effort is put in those packages. >> >> Orphaning the package will make it fall of radar and not even receive that little work. >> >> I'd prefer for policy 5.6.3 to drop the "at least one human" requirement, to allow for team maintained packages no person takes responsibility for. > > It seems you want to discuss changing the rules - that's confusing. You're reading too much in to what's written. I'm just raising an issue that's a consequence of the requested action of us developers. The lintian issue is the reason I don't trim Uploaders of the GIS packages I help maintain. I guess we can just not do what the MIA teams asks of us, that requires the least amount of work. Kind Regards, Bas