Bug#1034467: debian-faq: difficulties understanding the concept of stable-updates from the docs

Joost van Baal-Ilić <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.debian.devel.publicity
Message-ID <20230416061819.GG6889__15391.005510331$1681626449$gmane$org@beskar.mdcc.cx>
Package: debian-history
Version: 11.1
Severity: normal

Hi kalle,

Thanks for your interest & reporting this issue!

On Sat, Apr 15, 2023 at 04:10:43PM +0200, kalle wrote:
> hello,
> Consulting (today) the Debian FAQ and the wiki i find it confusing and
> time-consuming to grasp, how packages are updated in the stable
> release.
> From the FAQ I understand that:
> -2.1:"it changes if major security or usability fixes are incorporated"
> -2.2:"only get security updates"
> 
> From the Wiki, Article "DebianSoftware", section "Updates to […]" I
> take, that the tracking of "buster-updates" brings the latest versions
> or backports for the important parts. 
> Buster-updates is recommended too in the article "DebianBullseye",
> section FAQ.
> 
> At least 2.1 and 2.2 contradict. The term "usability fixes" in 2.1.
> then could be explained a bit more, like it is done in the wiki article
> "DebianSoftware".

I'm filing this as a bug in the debian-faq package, so that it won't get lost.
Indeed it's not completely obvious to everybody which entries to use in
sources.list under which circumstances; I've heard more people asking about
this.  However, I don't know all details myself either, and unfortunately don't
have the time to do this research now.  Do you maybe have the time to come up
with a suggested text to put in e.g. the FAQ?

Thanks anyway!

Bye,

Joost
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.