Re: Review request: publicity microflyer

James Addison <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.debian.devel.publicity,gmane.linux.debian.devel.documentation,gmane.linux.debian.internationalization.english
Message-ID <CALDQ5NxFHtwQO1nNH=1sT+wQARAYwwtJZo656JWPM8UA=YXYmw@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, 6 Jun 2023 at 04:12, Paul Wise <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2023-06-05 at 15:59 +0100, James Addison wrote:
>
> > I'd like to gather feedback on the wording and content of the flyer;
>
> I would recommend replacing the specific number of packages in the
> flyer with a more generic term like "many" or "thousands of" since this
> represents a maintenance burden as the real number changes. Also, even
> if you were to automate updating the number, the physical flyers will
> get out of date with the number.
>
> Similarly, the number of people contributing to Debian in 2023 is
> currently estimated at less than 1000 and it was estimated as much less
> than that in previous years. Probably the data isn't very accurate,
> but I do think it is a good idea to avoid specific numbers as our
> contribution levels fluctuate a fair bit. So I would drop "more than a
> thousand" from it.
>
> https://contributors.debian.org/

Thanks, Paul - I wasn't aware of that, and agree with updating the
wording for the contributor count.

Relating to the package count: I'm still processing some feedback and
ideas related to that, so: no confirmation either way yet, but some
edits will likely occur there.

> I suggest that the list of audiences we have software for be expanded
> based on the list of Debian blends and include "other" as well. Perhaps
> something like "software for businesses, programmers, scientists,
> educators, artists, multimedia, gamers, children, medicine, ham radio,
> politicians, home servers, accessibility and other uses".

This is a tricky one.  I did consider using mailing lists / blends as
sources of the audience list.  What I ended up deciding instead was on
some fairly arbitrary list that I think would represent some of the
areas of expertise that most people around the world would understand.
I also prefer that to using a generic term like 'everyone' or 'anyone'
-- I think that inspiring a few general use cases in people's minds,
and helping them to think of their friends and colleagues, is
valuable.

Thanks again,
James
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.