Bug#655150: marked as done ([debian-timeline] dates (years) unreadable in bottom timeline except with focus (no contrast))
"Debian Bug Tracking System" <[email protected]> Tue, 09 Dec 2025 12:21:07 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.devel.publicity |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1765282867-18679-0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Your message dated Tue, 09 Dec 2025 12:19:09 +0000 with message-id <[email protected]> and subject line Bug#1116674: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #655150, regarding [debian-timeline] dates (years) unreadable in bottom timeline exc= ept with focus (no contrast) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected] immediately.) --=20 655150: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D655150 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact [email protected] with problems ------------=_1765282867-18679-0 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Jan 2012 20:05:38 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2010-03-16) on busoni.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.9 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,HAS_PACKAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.0000 Tokens: new, 9; hammy, 98; neutral, 44; spammy, 0. spammytokens: hammytokens:0.000-+--Severity, 0.000-+--H*u:x86_64, 0.000-+--H*UA:3.1.16, 0.000-+--H*UA:1.9.2.24, 0.000-+--H*u:3.1.16 Return-path: <[email protected]> Received: from mail-qy0-f180.google.com ([209.85.216.180]) by busoni.debian.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <[email protected]>) id 1Rjyzq-00032T-05 for [email protected]; Sun, 08 Jan 2012 20:05:38 +0000 Received: by qcse1 with SMTP id e1so1937923qcs.11 for <[email protected]>; Sun, 08 Jan 2012 12:05:31 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=M0QH8GhDlph4vYb4ALF3V2RtlLYwurJE5wB0qp1jQYs=; b=PbPf/U+JUt3fwtLXmeM3b62SllNKFOujR9PgOwRWj3rPGzbj7tu31P6htNoq6mxcUS ORHkkkwOk51BP7jPsyjSrplDVw2//boC+5Gx01J96Bhp8pI2IOImsMUAYAWY/A1LzuZd G7ikS4tOWn1fbGh0RxrYPI6D5DY0qPilXEUdU= Received: by 10.224.182.2 with SMTP id ca2mr16042260qab.57.1326053131477; Sun, 08 Jan 2012 12:05:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.9] (modemcable156.191-56-74.mc.videotron.ca. [74.56.191.156]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id co15sm41584311qab.1.2012.01.08.12.05.30 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 08 Jan 2012 12:05:30 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <[email protected]> Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2012 15:05:29 -0500 From: Filipus Klutiero <[email protected]> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); en-US; rv:1.9.2.24) Gecko/20111114 Icedove/3.1.16 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: [email protected] Subject: [debian-timeline] dates (years) unreadable in bottom timeline except with focus (no contrast) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Delivered-To: [email protected] Package: debian-timeline Version: 16 Severity: normal The timeline uses shades of grey as background and for dates. Usually the shades are different so dates can be read, but that is not the case in the bottom timeline (the one with the least focus), which uses as background color the same shade of grey as dates use, except in the focused zone. For example, if you load the page, you initially see 2011 and 2012 in the bottom line, but nothing else, while you should see at least from 1999 on my screen. ------------=_1765282867-18679-0 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received: (at 655150-done) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Dec 2025 12:19:11 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.1-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2024-03-25) on buxtehude.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-107.4 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,HAS_BUG_NUMBER,RDNS_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,USER_IN_DKIM_WELCOMELIST,VERSION autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=4.0.1-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.0000 Tokens: new, 27; hammy, 135; neutral, 33; spammy, 0. spammytokens: hammytokens:0.000-+--HX-Debian:DAK, 0.000-+--H*rp:D*ftp-master.debian.org, 0.000-+--H*r:sk:fasolo., 0.000-+--H*RU:sk:fasolo., 0.000-+--Hx-spam-relays-external:sk:fasolo. Return-path: <[email protected]> Received: from muffat.debian.org ([2607:f8f0:614:1::1274:33]:36414) by buxtehude.debian.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_SECP256R1__RSA_PSS_RSAE_SHA256__AES_256_GCM:256) (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from <[email protected]>) id 1vSwgR-0004WM-21; Tue, 09 Dec 2025 12:19:11 +0000 Received: from [192.91.235.231] (port=57734 helo=fasolo.debian.org) from C=NA,ST=NA,L=Ankh Morpork,O=Debian SMTP,OU=Debian SMTP CA,CN=fasolo.debian.org,[email protected] (verified) by muffat.debian.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_SECP256R1__RSA_PSS_RSAE_SHA256__AES_256_GCM:256) (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from <[email protected]>) id 1vSwgS-009q5K-2x; Tue, 09 Dec 2025 12:19:11 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ftp-master.debian.org; s=smtpauto.fasolo; h=Date:Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Subject:MIME-Version:Cc:To:From: Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:In-Reply-To:References; bh=8WNbETKu0oJ7YsIyjM8sh2eesp6JeVuBNV4t+msXcU0=; b=rFsh6pf2AAFyKJZ6btl+Nmr7u3 K7fBQiVEZCcC/fPYqsakT51owvuQx+pKDbVsErRCN98w+Y5HnTYuHjYfw14xHSs3551NkU+iwYAph 0bHKvnLm6JbGCz7tCFdZbPLHsA/UulMVidaWRwGAq6+ARpbaq63+lt5vQV7jiC7MrGLRqFzuFbjc2 zjuLUxxwtgu1rk+56q0wzGXHO/RD7r+ngoXFtTVbCxnHvspjgq+hL8xDOEUyYKba4aZdhLudAMs/x yWlqDTFZWY63/Mk1Nhs0pwnPXK9zEtuGrzV9RnHfN0TP+NLMXOJ4rJ6R9jEjf7dPtzvTueVZV8FQ3 Zl/5hyuA==; Received: from alteholz by fasolo.debian.org with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from <[email protected]>) id 1vSwgP-003SKB-1B; Tue, 09 Dec 2025 12:19:09 +0000 From: Debian FTP Masters <[email protected]> To: [email protected],[email protected],[email protected],[email protected],[email protected],[email protected],[email protected],[email protected], X-DAK: dak rm Cc: [email protected] X-Filler: 42 X-Debian: DAK Debian: DAK MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Bug#1116674: Removed package(s) from unstable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <[email protected]> Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2025 12:19:09 +0000 X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2 Version: 46+rm Dear submitter, as the package debian-timeline has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/1116674 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using https://snapshot.debian.org/. Please note that the changes have been done on the master archive and will not propagate to any mirrors until the next dinstall run at the earliest. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [email protected]. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Thorsten Alteholz (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) ------------=_1765282867-18679-0--