Re: Thoughts on removing access to the Python teams repositories to inactive members ?

Nicholas D Steeves <[email protected]> Sat, 17 Jan 2026 17:42:23 -0500
Newsgroups gmane.linux.debian.devel.python
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi Thomas!

Thomas Goirand <[email protected]> writes:

> Hi,
>
> I agree with what's been said as reply: this is a very good idea, but 
> please exclude DDs and DMs from removal list.
>
> BTW, as a Salsa admin, I thought that maybe, we should do the same thing 
> globally: at least *lock* inactive accounts with the rule:
>
> - no activity for 3 years
> - account created at least 6 months ago
> - not a DD
>
> Any other criteria?
>
> Anyone to help me to write such a shell script? :)

Maybe base it on the GNOME project's Gitlab script?  As a one-off
contributor to upstream GNOME (three years ago, I think) I just received
a deactivation email, which also said this:

> To reactivate your account, sign in to GitLab at https://gitlab.[foo].org.

So maybe a check-in with a team somewhere to revalidate the credentials
socially (ie the web of trust vis à vis the supply chain thing)?

Best,
Nicholas
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 857 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQJEBAEBCgAuFiEE4qYmHjkArtfNxmcIWogwR199EGEFAmlsEFMQHHN0ZW5AZGVi
aWFuLm9yZwAKCRBaiDBHX30QYZ4ZD/9byEt15d/k3Mf1ktiYBCRh6uITM3gbWmsj
Kk9rcz/8qlTzb2QaOgwUSuBBhmkc1Vff4rV75tgSDLgneBqgJiI866D8TdBGGmLx
BCJHZf8CJ+sTnvtlbQF0l6C1PE2zGGpZ5JEHn5bpJgTmu03xy8YZWfjymzZCb3nK
rP4j5mnjylbFMHGOEvhQs7MGjtI39mTBVYp0LI3Fgrdo0+ToorOYoFSbTTeo5RRG
FMAKWBPPbYZyiSTxOBENKKFheDUv4iDcR/BZMeQgXKQ473kHI4NM1GChQd1KYROH
YzwR/hQVhbLRKvtPFi2ODwBdlh21FBuHUIaywmL+8hrnUh6iLQ2jgt23eh9qnF/3
DmD/l1J+BMcKCFql/p3R+GZREaZqSvLQkHjy/Z2+v/XHuU2AnEyd+4uPkf1Ehu7R
jdUbKqU6v39b8oBzwRovi1j/m/KODaO1y4BuhNq+8bX0dTxB5FEcCoXQdGxEkwb4
7qxrqRq6eIF8pT+mYfu7+5Zm11E/N35V1SQ+gpEKuoyB42MoKRFpfIM7T1yC2oua
8ek1+CquBGaeBnBeG3pt5DIRY9OrwDL/ZbQ2x9QpovmrvT8Dlxgaeo9LobHI+nDD
CTR1HOM0Nu+2CXiEBjQk5FTArlVcw1u5TchcUUeAzXeYSnrVDm8FcHHLdupOgdv4
pv6KBNkCrg==
=K5kK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----