Re: criteria for acceptable languages for central QA tools in Debian (was: Re: coordination between lintian/piuparts/adequate)
Holger Levsen <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.devel.quality-assurance,gmane.linux.debian.devel.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wed, Jan 08, 2025 at 09:11:02PM +0100, Serafeim (Serafi) Zanikolas wrote: > hi Holger, as you have addressed me here and... > On Wed Jan 8, 2025 at 11:57 AM CET, Holger Levsen wrote: > > (actually adequate is run on many more binary packages on piuparts.d.o, because > > p.d.o is not only testing unstable...) > > > > I would have loved if a test run with the new adequate on all those packages would > > have been made before the old adequate got kicked out. I guess technically it's > > not too late to do such a test run on the archive. > sure, let's find out! wouldn't this be simply a matter of pinning adequate to > testing/unstable? or even easier, you could just copy the adequate executable > from unstable to a bookworm instance (since adequate's only versioned dependency > is libc6 (>= 2.34) and latest stable ships 2.36 ... and here ^, I have to tell you that's *your* duty when rewriting adequate in another langugage. > slightly tangential: I'm somewhat surprised that piuparts.d.o would run > adequate/stable. I told you in 2024 already that piuparts.d.o runs adequate and that piuparts.d.o runs stable. > that might have made sense with an unmaintained adequate, but > I've added three new checks since the rewrite and it'd make no sense to have to > wait for a stable releases to use them (yes, I also owe you a patch to update > the hardwired list of adequate tags in piuparts; I've been holding back because > every single message from you on adequate comes across as bitter) I'm sorry if I come accross as bitter but I've been trying to tell you since the rewrite about this (and other problems) and that the new adequate needed more testing before uploading to unstable, but you just didnt listen... > ps. happy to also have a phone/video call if that would help us work better > together no, thanks. I'm not even involved in piuparts anymore. -- cheers, Holger ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ holger@(debian|reproducible-builds|layer-acht).org ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ OpenPGP: B8BF54137B09D35CF026FE9D 091AB856069AAA1C ⠈⠳⣄ Any business accepting Bitcoin is participating in the human race’s suicide.
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 833 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEuL9UE3sJ01zwJv6dCRq4VgaaqhwFAmd/luEACgkQCRq4Vgaa qhz4DBAAstrNBGdOHXwmWrekrj0gjNYgUwtuxas+fnUMD62qfWhtXl9twXPzJVfw u3Lq6SqRC9pKYHplYVUcBxItRijDA7r+hYEx511d1h7hCOqMr5UMPiDM0g1/QvFR w4s7nYWL9BHmvGe9bTwYfAvUV84iP4KvDaJtyCF+Q0cr18iQ1pXWQ/C4k3cVNCJH b347/79Ua7h6iIcbRv+CieD2FXhsxeA0ls9pLac+GF7wkyOMF9z/mbZgiePOMlXG 6P6RvPuhDyu0FPI1X5FfhZH4C4n58b5NeC3lGBiXOuZ9NaUwMYVLLhdST2qi19FR kSaMq1hn3CZ0q4HhuFt04btb4h0HWpc7gAzzgcABPs0glRWfNBm2mefaeFWJeU/f hgNXBCB3Jebm4Rcla5Y2J37PDmvNHjQX+soRXKaWjfm2KWSTey4cFEzpSAL6eLvu lVprWWMK/g3IgGlLvm+v1Yae0DuEU5L9oHjMc2GxQnX/a0RvA3YOsXDSa+aIGX8i ELbz2wlrSGIx+E6oQ6vJ6+qr5NWDOy8kD4WhKQZcEZbI+O0cytFiTMDtDXtOOrJj FmiU5m6PDQz2M8CcpFZnABKsIGrlOHuc/Zm20fZt7oxiU4H0s2rPveGMwgsS7EyT Bkq9KtSbGtB6rov/UuiefQbFgyFcVKWeJOg7XQ8j8rlZuAjuhRI= =9efO -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----