Re: UDD lists more than one source package for aboot

Hi Andreas,

On 15/09/25 at 07:36 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Another issue:
> 
> udd=> select source, version, distribution, release, component, maintainer, vcs_url, architecture, extra_source_only from sources where release = 'sid' and source = 'aboot' order by maintainer;
>  source |      version      | distribution | release | component |                        maintainer                        |                          vcs_url                           | architecture | extra_source_only 
> --------+-------------------+--------------+---------+-----------+----------------------------------------------------------+------------------------------------------------------------+--------------+-------------------
>  aboot  | 1.0~pre20200212-1 | debian       | sid     | main      | John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]> | https://salsa.debian.org/debian/aboot.git                  | any all      | 
>  aboot  | 1.0~pre20040408-4 | debian       | sid     | main      | Steve Langasek <[email protected]>                       | http://bzr.debian.org/bzr/pkg-aboot/aboot/branches/debian/ | any all      | 
> (2 Zeilen)

according to rmadison:
$ rmadison -S aboot
aboot              | 1.0~pre20040408-4    | unstable       | source
aboot              | 1.0~pre20200212-1    | unstable       | source
aboot              | 1.0~pre20200212-1    | unstable-debug | source
aboot-base         | 1.0~pre20040408-4    | unstable       | all
aboot-cross        | 1.0~pre20200212-1    | unstable       | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386, mips64el, ppc64el, s390x
aboot-cross        | 1.0~pre20200212-1+b1 | unstable       | riscv64
aboot-cross-dbgsym | 1.0~pre20200212-1    | unstable-debug | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386, mips64el, ppc64el, s390x
aboot-cross-dbgsym | 1.0~pre20200212-1+b1 | unstable-debug | riscv64

So there's a aboot-base package, Architecture:all, built from the
aboot/1.0~pre20040408-4 source. That's probably some missing cleanup on
the ftpmasters side, but I'm not sure why it's not detected and fixed
automatically. Ask them?

> > There's a sources_uniq view that hides those.
> 
> This is fine and I'll use this in future - but I would like to
> understand the duplicate anyway. 

How about https://lists.debian.org/debian-qa/2025/09/msg00026.html ?

Lucas