testing migration, udd, lintian and udebs [Re: [MBF] Update udeb packages to use non-aliased paths]

[looping in debian-qa]

Am 10.12.25 um 12:45 schrieb Michael Biebl:
> 
> no objections/concerns/... were raised, and the only feedback I got so 
> far is a message from Samuel, telling me, that he has fixed espeak and 
> espeakup (thanks!) making the list even shorter.
> 
> I will thus proceed with filing the bug reports now.
> 

I forgot to add:

We have the lintian tag "aliased-location" [1].
If a package is flagged that way, it is prevented from migrating to testing.

Currently this does not apply to udeb packages, but this might be simply 
by accident due to the way udd parses the lintian output?

See [2] how udd names the tag "udeb: " and the actual tag name is listed 
under information.

My questions:
- Is the way udd parses the lintian output this way deliberate?
- Is testing migration using udd?


Personally, I would like to see testing migration consider 
aliased-location for udebs too (once most packages have been fixed)


Michael




[1] https://udd.debian.org/lintian-tag/aliased-location
[2] https://udd.debian.org/lintian/?packages=bterm-unifont

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=IebA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----