Bug#1122902: UDD: lintian results for udeb packages are not properly parsed
Paul Gevers <[email protected]> Tue, 3 Feb 2026 22:37:21 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.devel.quality-assurance |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <602cd2e7-d65d-4be6-99c4-8ad3abf892c1__17476.7844889843$1770154770$gmane$org@debian.org> |
Hi, On Fri, 16 Jan 2026 15:44:31 +0100 Lucas Nussbaum <[email protected]> wrote: > On 14/12/25 at 13:42 +0100, Michael Biebl wrote: > > I've done a MBF to get all udeb producing packages updated to use > > non-aliased locations [1]. This is basically done, with one notable > > exception: src:linux, i.e. [2]. Today I spotted src:zlib in the excuses and in the udd list [3], but not in the MBF list [1]. Was that missed? It's listed for both sid and forky versions so apparently not a regression. > > Please deploy any fixes to udd only after src:linux has been fixed. > > ...and I failed to read this message before deploying the fix, which > means that src:linux might require an exception from the release team to > migrate to testing. Sorry about that. I'll add a hint for zlib (and for live-installer too, as the bug doesn't have a patch yet) Paul [1] https://udd.debian.org/cgi-bin/[email protected]&tag=udeb-usrmove [3] https://udd.debian.org/lintian-tag/aliased-location?affected=yes
OpenPGP_signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 585 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- wsC7BAABCABvBYJpgmqRCRCcXJnrBb11CkcUAAAAAAAeACBzYWx0QG5vdGF0aW9u cy5zZXF1b2lhLXBncC5vcmevecb1oSn0B7iNm3BeFjYOTHzHFTQ0Dma0ygPF2ZK1 XhYhBFi2bUhza+k7BS3mcpxcmesFvXUKAAAUDgf/QjumzJqe7tYqCh0lL6+gieX3 DURS8LPir/wrDunhu15YMcfhDuhFYdrzLaoU+hJ57alzKsDWwEnX0FlLxmJABTgN YOCvpfa2Qm8b0dG11eMwkCp/UihYVZ9tiPubuNCcn8Fpp3sVo19EwT+dQt+fEpHd xGBJJiCS0DgVgek8ch9Zt6xO2UDPWdGAaWsrZIz4jbsZatCmAfKzAgC7Ac5znH7N ZlOCd5+3ieKTDz8dxE/kXLFRzOho40vRvebVWKv31DnM8e9fPjCL8tmU5+wSK78w QXn1Hvj00h/5PPSFCLyBt7I45UdawTrz6PL8n3g4e/hIw467rmQ0uIFLSevaBg== =MMp1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----