Bug#1144127: qa.debian.org: qpdf package transition blocked by outdated binary packages
"Jay Berkenbilt" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.devel.quality-assurance |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <b710e542-6fef-499c-996b-0848d6bec7e3__41051.62759531$1786451008$gmane$org@app.fastmail.com> |
Package: qa.debian.org Severity: important X-Debbugs-Cc: [email protected], [email protected] I've been a Debian Developer since 2005 ([email protected]), but for many years, I've been maintaining only qpdf, for which I am also upstream. I apologize if I have just forgotten or overlooked some standard process here. Tl;Dr: libcupsfilters and r-cran-qpdf are blocking transition of qpdf, and I think the resolution is to just rebuild them. This is not an issue of ABI breakage in qpdf itself. Justification for important: the result of this issue is that printing breaks for people on unstable when the install the latest qpdf. See bugs 1144072 and 1144111. In the latest upstream release, qpdf started using C++-20 features internally, while the API remains C++-17-compatible. With the upload of 12.4.0-1 to unstable, several regressions were introduced: https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=qpdf These are for packages whose binary packages haven't been built recently enough to link with a C++ library that contains all the C++ functions. In particular, the builds are failing because this symbol is not found: std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char>>::_M_replace(unsigned long, unsigned long, char const*, unsigned long) This is an overload of std::string::replace that was introduced in C++-20. My recollection is that this situation should automatically trigger binary NMU (or rebuild or whatever it is these days) of the binary packages, currently libcupsfilters and r-cran-qpdf, but it's been a couple of days since upload, so I'm not sure if I have to do something to poke this. Please let me know: * If I just waited, would this "automatically" resolve? * If I have to poke, is this the right place to poke? * Have I misdiagnosed this? If so, I can create a patch that removes the C++-20 call, but I don't think it should be necessary to do that. I plan on introducing additional C++-20 calls in upcoming qpdf versions.