Bug#1141159: transition: opencolorio
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.devel.release |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <ec4a5281-0da2-4bfc-8892-c0ddf0355d1f__27015.5740830646$1784018248$gmane$org@debian.org> |
Control: tags -1 confirmed On 01/07/2026 12:24, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > On 30/06/2026 18:13, Paride Legovini wrote: >> Package: release.debian.org >> Severity: normal >> X-Debbugs-Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] >> Control: affects -1 + src:opencolorio >> User: [email protected] >> Usertags: transition >> >> Hi, >> >> I would like to request a transition slot for opencolorio, which had >> a SOVERSION bump from libopencolorio2.1t64 to libopencolorio2.5. >> >> The auto-generated transition overview [1] looks correct. This is >> expected to be a simple transition. There are two reverse-build-depends: >> >> - openimageio, which re-builds cleanly against the new opencolorio >> - blender, which currently FTBFS and is therefore currently not in >> testing. A fixed blender is currently in experimental, but it requires >> the newer opencoplorio which is the object of this transition. >> >> Uploads will be prepared by Antoine (in X-Debbugs-Cc), which I will >> review and sponsor. Both opencolorio and openimageio are under the >> debian-phototools-team, so we shouldn't need binNMUs, given that we can >> easily do uploads. > > Let's wait until the Python 3.14 transition is done. Go ahead. Cheers, Emilio