Re: towards a reproducible forky

--n7x86pZYOPKOyXcw
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, Jul 20, 2026 at 03:01:19PM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> And a reason why I suggested reproducible rebuilds should consider=20
> switching to nocheck in the future is that it is quite common that
> the testsuite of a package fails on some architecture based on what
> hardware the build machine is.

FTR, this seems like an interesting idea to me. Is it safe to enable this
now for https://reproduce.debian.net/ ?


--=20
cheers,
	Holger

 =E2=A2=80=E2=A3=B4=E2=A0=BE=E2=A0=BB=E2=A2=B6=E2=A3=A6=E2=A0=80
 =E2=A3=BE=E2=A0=81=E2=A2=A0=E2=A0=92=E2=A0=80=E2=A3=BF=E2=A1=81  holger@(d=
ebian|reproducible-builds|layer-acht).org
 =E2=A2=BF=E2=A1=84=E2=A0=98=E2=A0=B7=E2=A0=9A=E2=A0=8B=E2=A0=80  OpenPGP: =
B8BF54137B09D35CF026FE9D 091AB856069AAA1C
 =E2=A0=88=E2=A0=B3=E2=A3=84

"tja" - a German reaction to the apocalypse, dawn of the gods, nuclear war,
an alien attack or no bread in the house.

--n7x86pZYOPKOyXcw
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=qPCb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--n7x86pZYOPKOyXcw--