Re: regarding build speed on riscv64
Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.riscv,gmane.linux.debian.devel.release |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <apat67YHxlmouRp0@localhost> |
On Mon, Aug 31, 2026 at 06:39:07PM -0400, Dominique Belhachemi wrote: > On Mon, Aug 31, 2026 at 4:55 PM Aurelien Jarno <[email protected]> wrote: > ... > > In parallel, we continue to follow upstream kernel support for the K3, > > with the hope we can get everything in 7.4. Currently the PCI controller > > [2] and the thermal management chip [3] are missing, and a few smaller > > fixes that will likely go through the stable trees anyway. The bad news > > is that it 7.4 is currently scheduled for January [4], so 7.3 will be > > the LTS version that will go into Forky. This means we'll need to work > > with the kernel team to backport the corresponding patches into 7.3. > > > > > Would it be possible for Debian to procure and distribute 10 to 20 K3 > boards to interested DDs? Money in Debian is a mess, and your suggestion is somewhere around € 10k. > Having hardware available to individual maintainers for local testing and > debugging would certainly help unblock and strengthen the riscv64 port. What problems do you plan to debug where you need physical hardware? Like every release architecture (and many ports architectures) riscv64 has a porterbox, which is usually what individual maintainers need for debugging issues. The current riscv64 porterbox is identical to the buildds except for the two new K1 ones, most issues seen on the buildds can therefore be reproduced and debugged on the porterbox. > Best > -Dominique cu Adrian