Re: CVE-2017-5715

Georgi Naplatanov <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.debian.devel.security
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 3/23/22 22:43, Leandro Cunha wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 2:33 PM Georgi Naplatanov <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> On 3/23/22 18:35, piorunz wrote:
>>> On 23/03/2022 15:41, Leandro Cunha wrote:
>>>
>>>> Please, take into consideration what is in the link and you can
>>>> consult through
>>>> it about CVE: https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2017-5715
>>>
>>> Leandro,
>>> I've been on this website before I posted with spectre-meltdown-checker
>>> results. I have vulnerable status just like author of this topic. I am
>>> on intel-microcode 3.20210608.2, and by the look of it, this bug
>>> supposed to be fixed in:
>>>
>>> "intel-microcode: Some microcode updates to partially adress
>>> CVE-2017-5715 included in 3.20171215.1
>>> Further updates in 3.20180312.1"
>>>
>>> So my version of microcode is 3-4 years newer than that.
>>>
>>> Is it microcode problem, or spectre-meltdown-checker displaying wrong
>>> information, or something else entirely?
>>>
>>
>> I want to mention that on the same computer with kernel Debian 5.10.92-2
>>
>> spectre-meltdown-checker
>>
>> reports that the system is not vulnerable to CVE-2017-5715
>>
>> Kind regards
>> Georgi
>>
> 
> This script is reporting an already patched CVE as vulnerable.


Are you sure this behavior on 5.10.103-1 is not some kind of regression?
What is the evidence that vulnerability is still fixed?


Kind regards
Georgi
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.