Re: amd64 running on Intel Celeron and Pentium? (was: [SECURITY] [DSA 5113-1] firefox-esr security update)

Levis Yarema <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.debian.devel.security
Message-ID <CACgUwo+a-89-cgSDqUF6W1SK5ZYYGx2PdNAtGwG0GQ6-LgbKMw@mail.gmail.com>
What security features do P3/P4/PM systems lack? I only know that the Intel
ME was introduced with early Core 2 systems and that is well known to have
security issues. Today people spend extra money for a system where you can
disable the ME in the UEFI though it is only disabled by a setting then and
can be re-enabled any time. I would prefer a computer without Intel ME.

Am Mi., 13. Apr. 2022 um 21:11 Uhr schrieb Michael Stone <[email protected]
>:

> On Wed, Apr 13, 2022 at 08:18:30PM +0200, Levis Yarema wrote:
> >What about Spectre /Meltdown? P3/P4/Pentium M systems don´t have that?
> Core 2
> >systems to my knowledge can.
>
> There's no reason to believe netburst systems are not affected by any of
> the cpu issues identified in the past few years, but they are obsolete
> and unsupported so nobody is making official statements about them.
> These systems also lack a number of security features present in modern
> CPUs; picking an ancient chip for "security reasons" is likely
> misguided. Also, in the context of this thread, note that the most
> recent Core 2 processor was released in 2010.
>
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.