Re: amd64 running on Intel Celeron and Pentium? (was: [SECURITY] [DSA 5113-1] firefox-esr security update)
Levis Yarema <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.devel.security |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CACgUwo+a-89-cgSDqUF6W1SK5ZYYGx2PdNAtGwG0GQ6-LgbKMw@mail.gmail.com> |
What security features do P3/P4/PM systems lack? I only know that the Intel ME was introduced with early Core 2 systems and that is well known to have security issues. Today people spend extra money for a system where you can disable the ME in the UEFI though it is only disabled by a setting then and can be re-enabled any time. I would prefer a computer without Intel ME. Am Mi., 13. Apr. 2022 um 21:11 Uhr schrieb Michael Stone <[email protected] >: > On Wed, Apr 13, 2022 at 08:18:30PM +0200, Levis Yarema wrote: > >What about Spectre /Meltdown? P3/P4/Pentium M systems don´t have that? > Core 2 > >systems to my knowledge can. > > There's no reason to believe netburst systems are not affected by any of > the cpu issues identified in the past few years, but they are obsolete > and unsupported so nobody is making official statements about them. > These systems also lack a number of security features present in modern > CPUs; picking an ancient chip for "security reasons" is likely > misguided. Also, in the context of this thread, note that the most > recent Core 2 processor was released in 2010. > >