Re: Reaction to potential PGP schism

On 21/12/23 04:16, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> # What Can Debian Do About This?
> 
> I've attempted to chart one possible path out of part of this situation
> by proposing a minimized, simplified interface to some common baseline
> OpenPGP semantics -- in particular, the "Stateless OpenPGP" interface,
> or "sop", as documented here:
> 
>     https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dkg-openpgp-stateless-cli/

Hi, thanks for the detailed overview.

As the Uploader of rust-sequoia-openpgp, what do you think of the 
related sequoia-chameleon-gnupg project [1] (drop-in replacement for gpg 
that uses sequoia internally)?

Would it work as a stop-gap measure while the Debian infrastructure 
moves from GnuPG to something else (to `sop`, for instance)?

Regards,

[1] https://gitlab.com/sequoia-pgp/sequoia-chameleon-gnupg not yet in 
Debian AFAIK