Bug#1001320: needrestart misdetects socket activated ssh and restarts service instead of socket
Timo Weingärtner <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.devel.ssh |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <4128449.5qcUtGkdVP__31266.4855200396$1640007399$gmane$org@timo01.tiwe.de> |
Hallo Marc Haber, 19.12.21 16:15 Marc Haber: > On Wed, Dec 08, 2021 at 04:01:30PM +0100, Timo Weingärtner wrote: > > 08.12.21 13:31 Marc Haber: > > > I am running a number of test systems with ssh as socket activated > > > service. Sometimes, after an update, I find myself without ssh access to > > > those systems (connection refused). After a console login and systemctl > > > restart ssh.socket, things are fine again. > > > > > > I THINK this might be connected to needrestart. Today, a libc6 update > > > marked the running ssh daemon (that I was using for the update) as using > > > > > obsolete libraries, which resulted in the following console output: > > To me it looks like a problem in needrestart. The (forked off) sshd > > process > > handling your client connection belongs to cgroup session-NN.scope, no > > matter if it was started by systemd socket activation or regular sshd. > > I concur with your analysis. So we need a bug report against needrestart > with the title "misdetects ssh as started from ssh.service if it's > actually ssh.socket or [email protected]"? ssh.socket doesn't contain processes. ssh@<connected_socket>.service would AFAIR be detected if libpam-systemd is not installed or if the connection is not yet complete. At least I remember (some years back) needrestart showing me ssh@<connected_socket>.service ticked by default sawing off the branch I was sitting on when blindly nodded through. We should be more specific here: it's about the per-client process which should not get restarted by default. Even when ssh.service is running it misdetects per-client processes, but in that case it is usually quite harmless. > > A workaround might be masking ssh.service. > > That seems to do it for me, this hasn't happeneed on my test systems > since I masked ssh.service. I do consider this a valid workaround (but > not a soution) for the time being. > > ssh maintainer, I think this warrants at least some documentation, for > example in /usr/share/doc/openssh-server/README.Debian.gz, as the way > documented there just suggests disabling ssh.service and not masking it. Masking ssh.service also helps with people (possibly even including yourself) doing "systemctl restart ssh" after editing sshd_config. Grüße Timo
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 833 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEE87+TxUS8xnavTxo5VO6rSJSm4+0FAmHAhh8ACgkQVO6rSJSm 4+2+Ow/9FsqN5ExkHZEBOmeHfXu6vVTRAOYOQCIoMxO6/iMgrmBwNt4j8DwBnzPN G/Tau108LSnjlfawAW2qJvjfsxed1Xo0UIGIPtD02KzaEw6RcLgnH/+USwf7wyxh Adrxrzqv3mzR0lrwZ7H7AOMVcWJEP6+bTe0LFuRJfSFNkU/Gy0Fqmyg85U/XR9yc 8s1FrxKac1HdEt02SGibLA8zehhM8LwGT23eQi6bx7Im5QJSglWwZcsVm43dt+Kw jTEBcaTwdfZdrOju5gwS9MVU/VR5Ux66606PXmhYu7lC+UmtpQIo8KcbK+oIzudD tOT4qlQt+cWeuZDKiJcpGAkzkawD6efQ48clJI3adnMrJj3XqJQN7EfvA5IZoYco CeVWeBIF8dbkbi0asjDNqFSvHoA+RDdzbERrnV5f6RyalP502V3wmq9q2Tx9wLRD F5L46R2lM0BjDCbyIfY+KsqkmgNA4cWeAF3DBLvjQ/CRUTs1kmMz4UI8K/SkUO9i phMkVOTwS8cXCqLG+3vjJ3JlarvX2CnZmzKHSbNpvVTTSS75S+ubDNg2+RDnLqYk ZCYuhXSpCwCYW9c8fYuJSOHSZ2UsaCIcpOtuVvu2M/4PHYFicEXAW6Wom7EMbOiN xBUqDwm4Aoc1+uzy1Gyb8WstjUZdou4dQuwduwrEIOEgoLiyndk= =ZGj4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----