Bug#1025533: New systemd socket activation breaks existing setups
Colin Watson <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.devel.ssh |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <Y52rgyLLTwv8tcFb__46150.0287101202$1671278782$gmane$org@riva.ucam.org> |
On Tue, Dec 06, 2022 at 11:51:08AM +0100, martin f krafft wrote: > Package: openssh-server > Version: 1:9.1p1-1 > Severity: important > > Compared to Debian's 1:9.0p1-1, this version provides a `ssh.socket` > file that has `Accept=no`, and consequently, the package no longer > provides `[email protected]`. This is most likely related to [Steve's > work](https://salsa.debian.org/ssh-team/openssh/-/commit/bfb10550c1e8c69757aff2860f60b78253fb9851) > titled "Support systemd socket activation", despite socket > activation working out of the box previously. > > The new approach breaks existing setups that relied on systemd > handling the `accept()` call. At the very least, a `NEWS.Debian` > entry would be in order. > > Better yet would be a Debconf question to see what the user > wants/needs, defaulting to the status quo, rather than changing it. Steve, can I pass this bug over to you to address? Thanks,