Re: Debian openssh option review: considering splitting out GSS-API key exchange

Bernd Zeimetz <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.debian.devel.general,gmane.linux.debian.devel.ssh
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Tue, 2024-04-02 at 12:04 +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Apr 02, Colin Watson <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> > At the time, denyhosts was popular, but it was removed from Debian
> > several years ago.  I remember that, when I dealt with that on my
> > own
> > systems, fail2ban seemed like the obvious replacement, and my
> > impression
> > is that it's pretty widely used nowadays; it's very pluggable but
> > it
> > normally works by adding firewall rules.  Are there any similar
> > popular
> > systems left that rely on editing /etc/hosts.deny?
> Yes, people. I object to removing TCP wrappers support since the
> patch 
> is tiny and it supports use cases like DNS-based ACLs which cannot be
> supported by L3 firewalls.
> 

There are more than enough ways to keep the entries based on dns
records in your l3 firewalls uptodate, I can't see how this should
warrant to keep yet another patch Jan^WMarco.

-- 
 Bernd Zeimetz                            Debian GNU/Linux Developer
 http://bzed.de                                http://www.debian.org
 GPG Fingerprint: ECA1 E3F2 8E11 2432 D485  DD95 EB36 171A 6FF9 435F
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.