Re: Early migration for openssh?
Cyril Brulebois <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.devel.ssh,gmane.linux.debian.devel.boot,gmane.linux.debian.devel.release |
|---|---|
| Organization | Debian |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Colin Watson <[email protected]> (2025-05-14): > I also filed #1105179 earlier this week for an unblock for this. Sorry, I didn't think of the obvious, checking unblock requests… > I obviously have a bias here, but IMO 1:10.0p1-5 is pretty clearly > better than 1:10.0p1-2 and there doesn't seem to be a particular > reason to wait. I was definitely asking your point of view as maintainer(s), I didn't want to risk “rushing” something that in your opinion should mature some more. I'll follow up on the unblock request in a moment. Thanks for the swift answer! Cheers, -- Cyril Brulebois ([email protected]) <https://debamax.com/> D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 833 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEtg6/KYRFPHDXTPR4/5FK8MKzVSAFAmgj7GAACgkQ/5FK8MKz VSCk7Q/6AxFsM2muia46z2VthlUPL3dFtvv4O4OxyAAovuewSo4WjaFGYbFpkOSi L3qHYCMOpfWB5d6NmBusTAuz0kRLCfTpvh76PbeD2qR1vpbvUTXS5FY1CvPH+21g vTR0M3ZaAtJswLY4wGy7MgfBpy03dBNSfccF2jThFC3hC2stneb1r454RtogLT3V /Y3gHP5gy+K+UMAuXA8PIrgMe0eeUVTNn42uwFFavnr0pZyz0mLNBQ6YnSZxQiN4 ZNRtk/2kSWGWq0O4Ed8yjXjEb/EUQIp0kOiVFR5cKAkjk8N+MvLD8DScgM+dDfQV iNmeyiluwUwUzRzPYSrYj+ok2dDGunad6+JA1LLCqUxDX3vQaUlAYMuaabY+VpKX WwyNtwzRDQ8LWTaYbfvPzpZsElbNOw4VjYJu4cui2YYGCMIfKJWxvQWIfKtw2TPG QyNP8i0sR6WoL8uHTJolyD+dIgDuXDvGrpJ0viottxgAVwSAQAOi46e+srR11iR9 6fpwnjpbjj/rhlIeO67+MVH4HCztFdWDHvtF+RR4t6ZCpbj4/z9CTGdwt7QDVL5P f+Vv0/cmrpBNFCdG2sFElSTggfWRdOVLVnBdI0eZun58lhUjtTAyHHPXbPDQBefS cVGmX95xLKfj35h/hKKGct7EfCkZyNdOZXZF0AkgFY5Rg7IwJsM= =All5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----