Bug#1038150: Bug#1038151: Bug#1038150: openssh-client: Please add the openssh-client group rename from "ssh" to "_ssh" to the bookworm release notes

Chris Hofstaedtler <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.debian.devel.ssh
Message-ID <aHpX2kz4NiQ5_XEl__14946.1074777477$1752848496$gmane$org@per.namespace.at>
Control: reassign 1038151 openssh-client

On Wed, Jun 18, 2025 at 11:04:05AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 18, 2025 at 10:28:41AM +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> > On Fri, 16 Jun 2023 at 02:43:29 +0200, Alban Browaeys wrote:
> > > I cannot login anymore via ssh.
> > > I have the openemediavault installed on this box to manage the setup and
> > > it set AllowGroups to "root ssh" in /etc/ssh/sshd_config.
> > ...
> > > After the request from a user to rename the "ssh" group to free it for its
> > > own use, the "ssh" group was rename to "_ssh" in
> > > https://salsa.debian.org/ssh-team/openssh/-/commit/18da782ebe789d0cf107a550e474ba6352e68911
> > > 
> > > But other users as in
> > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=990456#35 or tools to
> > > manage Debian have come to rely on this "ssh" group.
> > 
> > I believe the openssh maintainers' position on this would be that the
> > ssh group was never intended to have ordinary users added to it, and
> > therefore this would be a bug in "openemediavault", which seems to be
> > third-party software that is not included in Debian?
> 
> This is correct.  I 100% intended the group to be for internal use only.
> 
> I agree with the sentiment of this bug that it perhaps would have been worth
> documenting in the release notes, but I didn't have time; and since
> bookworm's release is now receding in the rear-view mirror, perhaps this has
> been overtaken by events?  It's probably still worth documenting somewhere,
> although as you say:
> 
> > Unfortunately, /etc/group doesn't have a mechanism for pointing to
> > documentation about the intended purpose of a group, so it's easy for a
> > sysadmin or a piece of third-party software to start using a group for
> > an unintended purpose, and I think that's what has happened here.
> 
> ... so I don't know exactly where.

I agree it should not be in trixie's release notes. As this is now 
mostly an openssh "issue", I'm reassigning it.

Maybe it should be in openssh-client's README.Debian?

Chris
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.