Bug#131090: marked as done (scp: please enable -f option to fork to background)
"Debian Bug Tracking System" <[email protected]> Tue, 02 Jun 2026 07:21:01 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.devel.ssh |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1780384861-2206555-0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Your message dated Tue, 02 Jun 2026 07:19:57 +0000 with message-id <[email protected]> and subject line redirect to upstream has caused the Debian Bug report #131090, regarding scp: please enable -f option to fork to background to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected] immediately.) --=20 131090: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D131090 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact [email protected] with problems ------------=_1780384861-2206555-0 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Jan 2002 02:31:46 +0000 Return-path: <[email protected]> Received: from nchm04a34.rmt.utk.edu (peon) [128.169.250.34] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 16Uf6e-0000Vp-00; Sat, 26 Jan 2002 20:31:45 -0600 Received: from alphenglor by peon with local (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16Uf6c-0008Kq-00; Sat, 26 Jan 2002 21:31:42 -0500 Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2002 21:31:42 -0500 From: Rob Mahurin <[email protected]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[email protected]> Subject: scp: please enable -f option to fork to background Message-ID: <20020127023142.GA31947@peon> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.25i X-Reportbug-Version: 1.41.14213 Organization: Hello Cruel World Industries, Ltd. X_Operating_System: Debian GNU/Linux (potato), powered by Linux 2.2.19 System_Uptime: 21:29:21 up 38 days, 4:59, 3 users, load average: 1.13, 1.09, 1.08 X-Unnecessary-Clutter: Please ignore this header. I apologize for the inconvenience. Sender: Rob Mahurin <[email protected]> Delivered-To: [email protected] Package: ssh Version: 1:3.0.2p1-3 Severity: wishlist I like the -f option for ssh and think it should be included in scp (perhaps automatically enabling -q). Thank you. Rob -- System Information Debian Release: 3.0 Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux peon 2.2.19 #1 Wed Apr 18 00:51:33 EDT 2001 i586 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C Versions of packages ssh depends on: ii debconf 1.0.22 Debian configuration management sy ii libc6 2.2.4-7 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libpam-modules 0.72-34 Pluggable Authentication Modules f ii libpam0g 0.72-34 Pluggable Authentication Modules l ii libssl0.9.6 0.9.6c-1 SSL shared libraries ii libwrap0 7.6-9 Wietse Venema's TCP wrappers libra ii zlib1g 1:1.1.3-18 compression library - runtime -- The IBM purchase of ROLM gives new meaning to the term "twisted pair". -- Howard Anderson, "Yankee Group" ------------=_1780384861-2206555-0 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received: (at 131090-done) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Jun 2026 07:20:01 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.1-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2024-03-25) on buxtehude.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=4.0.1-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.0000 Tokens: new, 11; hammy, 56; neutral, 19; spammy, 0. spammytokens: hammytokens:0.000-+--H*r:posteo.de, 0.000-+--H*RU:posteo.de, 0.000-+--Hx-spam-relays-external:posteo.de, 0.000-+--H*RU:submission, 0.000-+--Hx-spam-relays-external:submission Return-path: <[email protected]> Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]:36599) by buxtehude.debian.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_X25519__RSA_PSS_RSAE_SHA256__AES_256_GCM:256) (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from <[email protected]>) id 1wUJPt-009Fuk-03 for [email protected]; Tue, 02 Jun 2026 07:20:01 +0000 Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EAF83240103 for <[email protected]>; Tue, 2 Jun 2026 09:19:57 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=posteo.jp; s=2017; t=1780384797; bh=Ib85G0jjuWp4VZDHF0usIrZEBCI1afpwE61MyI454JY=; h=MIME-Version:Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:From; b=j5JvulDFBhRvV+LN1BqKcrxt3/mnKgC8yYDQz938/GPuXTESuBlIKTTNO1E/ahdZW BJFV575Qllaq+pEO8lddemDfEta2xOdBsuFsty7JAjYTRWMVQ6ns26YIrhDsQGRR7N CDOmgf+p3mDb9izAcav7ck+jleCRt9cWyceetZzOpEloOvoX68cUJ3WFe/8ltD9ZYW RsID8L1B7pUXkB4GAN79j7OWp61d8c9f0Dxfhm9fz9wbGdCnN3d5ELXAxcCacGDieL 4jQWvbbRudmZfRW05fGZkjpd1JmQQYZaJAaDE/XV1cOm9bVnU5YnHFUe3wiUGMfp6E y0CjD4tV7h4+g== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4gV2K94drNz9rxK for <[email protected]>; Tue, 2 Jun 2026 09:19:57 +0200 (CEST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2026 07:19:57 +0000 From: [email protected] To: [email protected] Subject: redirect to upstream Message-ID: <[email protected]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hello Rob, please report your wish to the upstream project. Debian itself can nothing do about it. Regards, Christian ------------=_1780384861-2206555-0--