Bug#1080322: latexmk: add -parallel=N option
Preuße, Hilmar <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.devel.tetex |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <2c113059-9220-487c-bb6f-a605cc665cbc__44047.402932641$1773732807$gmane$org@web.de> |
Am 17.03.2026 um 01:40 schrieb Barak A. Pearlmutter: Hello Barak, thanks for response. > Yes, John Collins responded with a cogent discussion of the > implementation options and their tradeoffs. > I guess he did not made yet a statement if and when the feature will be implemented, correct? Hilmar -- sigfault
OpenPGP_signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 840 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- wsF5BAABCAAjFiEEaXGmC/nkbIhxf16kxiZYRqvgLIsFAmm5AwcFAwAAAAAACgkQxiZYRqvgLIsg qxAAm2uffGKeC4C3Kn86oIbSmYPpMhblK+JUoL1ot8FPhuRcLfUb3KPBpoINpOBfeHvDEeyIyMXp yppEt8zC3U8bQ9YZ0ahj40xR6jO890WeVNTOPW5aKQpVjo88Uz3kP2uraGqr8ErsuOCREFNz7CoZ ZK1cJ5GeouzDdrV3+Ks1Hsqc+g8UXTBksQIHdosvHAVOBqlFhPWgk9wPxNjRztA++iDzjfl+91QI XsmKqDCOpN4zXVW2BA+RXU8AYP43THtoiwg8vWK2WonnhKihjCQQ/ot5Y7IvwrUMyM/WLCsYXX79 /4DzuYxzSPBymCwsF9MyNh0M1lRlpjX9MdYQa+y93tvTnmItjaxlezvkKADqHqkLtsmEmQoaGSfd O3VobE5WSiqjVO/spSAxkayn3mcUOTPISzv7vmV3ZYwHo2ccWG/Jy71pvzEgzGLGmEPxzl7kXQ2I KnBcRGodTgRxfV4FzvNTiRjbRHTvIi5lwus8CqwqjLvAJr9mtxzukMOJnTqMqoIUfRTjuSQmF//T IdWU+XxxAJHgVsJRntTkMJBptkBfnslK9kpDtJO905HqLwVXo/T/jhtZWfMZfWmA5EpilEpM9Mzs GUbBPIm3cwxXqa8y7MvkOse2i8pur+1WCTZ7xXacrLHwnOq/f04wtjMXjfS3aUpw36vvDs8zXwpk nqo= =1RPC -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----