Bug#1118385: Non-reproducibility in pdfTeX
Preuße, Hilmar <[email protected]> Fri, 15 May 2026 00:09:47 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.devel.tetex |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <185bd925-a010-4b80-bc7c-17762bfd4cf5__35913.4545012907$1778796686$gmane$org@web.de> |
Am 13.05.2026 um 22:54 schrieb Karl Berry:
Hello Karl,
> \includegraphics[width=8cm]{valuators.png}
>
> Thanks much, Akira.
>
> So ... can anyone try to find a patch for libpng? Maybe AI can help :) :(,
> if anyone knows how to ask it.
>
My intention was not necessarily to get a fix here, but rather a first
statement *if* the bug(?) is in pdfTeX or in libpng. Maybe I contacted
the wrong mailing list, and should have better talked to the pdfTeX
mailing list.
I'll happily hand over the issue to the libpng maintainers, however I
could need some help, what needs to be changed. Is Adams description in
[1] correct?
Hilmar
> At least, it doesn't make sense to me to change pdftex + luatex +
> dvipdfmx + non-TeX ... --thanks, karl.
>
[1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1118385#89
--
sigfault
OpenPGP_signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 840 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- wsF5BAABCAAjFiEEaXGmC/nkbIhxf16kxiZYRqvgLIsFAmoGSCsFAwAAAAAACgkQxiZYRqvgLIsV ORAAm+AQ5Fn3WearqNw+PUkKVlU4q5GbzTVlDQaqykbqCbbVEPdr+nhBgIVEnGDtuQbkeCjOepb2 aCAcPCpoSKGM9Oi8EfnIwpLql2rhgdDxouV35P2BF90TX4BcO28LQGj+1tSTibLzE0hfL9ojMieU hThA4KkuDdSU5AvzVabkAoSq8IranuGI0xaOFh8wqfO5PoIAWV8xtrM3eWuUqOY/6NgNahzOSprD hJsD5nW8dntOt+S25BnI9kab11BEUiW6oWZz5wsqnnsWH+bBmrWDZYZKCq0d02P+mlh2gqjQWgUx Jiqykh29slziC0Y6WpY8arqGfUBi+NdA1OD6AGkMK9pfqt8btEPZoK/RMrL4pp4u/O1GYrX4YH6w cH2oCWBtc74sNSZWhqNCpIjEGNyZaw36GxEku4SIxcr4bQZgetJ0LYbiOnt2QMQ0QUciIuXk58M4 4+6kPaloZZFCE2D8qyyZgUL/sbAPj1Oq5N+S6gLDnSL3jkqPOHXv4dhxjZ7wyRSyD67IoYFsbZzZ YADrNV2gx9kx3JufsCLTkcm/Pn9HhKJ5Su8xOVaBCpuKfEdaH0TJqiEcsELf6f4j+nGhzZKbRT3m 2iM8wh+DjE8ZlUTh6nJQtKaJS7ww5fgKo8X7pUrhXX9cyN7Pfls91vIkQ8SazwnIf7ZySgrobSGT /6M= =X3nZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----