Bug#1118385: Non-reproducibility in pdfTeX

Preuße, Hilmar <[email protected]> Fri, 15 May 2026 00:09:47 +0200
Newsgroups gmane.linux.debian.devel.tetex
Message-ID <185bd925-a010-4b80-bc7c-17762bfd4cf5__35913.4545012907$1778796686$gmane$org@web.de>
Am 13.05.2026 um 22:54 schrieb Karl Berry:

Hello Karl,

>      \includegraphics[width=8cm]{valuators.png}
> 
> Thanks much, Akira.
> 
> So ... can anyone try to find a patch for libpng? Maybe AI can help :) :(,
> if anyone knows how to ask it.
> 

My intention was not necessarily to get a fix here, but rather a first 
statement *if* the bug(?) is in pdfTeX or in libpng. Maybe I contacted 
the wrong mailing list, and should have better talked to the pdfTeX 
mailing list.

I'll happily hand over the issue to the libpng maintainers, however I 
could need some help, what needs to be changed. Is Adams description in 
[1] correct?

Hilmar

> At least, it doesn't make sense to me to change pdftex + luatex +
> dvipdfmx + non-TeX ... --thanks, karl.
> 

[1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1118385#89
-- 
sigfault
OpenPGP_signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 840 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=X3nZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----