Re: Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
John Klos <[email protected]> Tue, 28 Oct 2025 17:41:43 +0000 (UTC)
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.ports.68k,gmane.linux.debian.devel.kernel,gmane.linux.debian.devel.toolchain,gmane.linux.debian.devel.release |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> yes - maintaining all special cases is an effort. > yes, but your mileage may vary: You often have a special case where general > performance measuerement didb't catch the use case. > yes - that are all people involde in debian or generally in Open Source. > yes, throwing out old clumsy code with special workaround for old hardware flaws > is a great cleanup. It seems you're talking about something different than what the discussion is about: this discussion is about the baselines for generated binaries. This isn't a discussion about dropping support for certain architectures and removing code. I carefully asked what I asked because I'd like to see real data about what advantages there are to defaulting compiler flags to an x86-64 level other than default, for instance. Answering "yes" without providing any information or links to information or measurements isn't really all that helpful. Thanks, John Klos