Re: [RFC] Counter-Proposal -- Interpretation of DFSG on Artificial Intelligence (AI) Models
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.devel.vote |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Apr 24, 2025 18:40, Marco d'Itri <[email protected]> wrote: > > [email protected] wrote: > > >Could you give a brief summary of the main differences you see between > >your and Mo's proposal? You call it "counter-proposal", so I expected > >something radically different, but so far I fail to see it. > His goal is to make impractical enough to be usually impossible to have > LLMs and neural networks in Debian. > I recommend to think hard about the possible ramifications and > consequences of this. > > -- > ciao, > Marco The only part I do not like in his proposal is about non-free. To me we should be more liberal there. Otherwise, it matches my definition of free software. The fact that it may be hard to find LLM matching this definition is, I agree, not a good thing. But should we give up on our free software definition because of that? IMO we should not. Thomas Goirand (zigo)