language (Re: Proposal -- Interpretation of DFSG on Artificial Intelligence (AI) Models)

Holger Levsen <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.debian.devel.vote
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Sun, Apr 27, 2025 at 12:24:28PM +0200, Ansgar 🙀 wrote:
> > "ToxicCandy Allowlist" by assessing it as non-AI model in ML-policy.
> Could we stop using terms like "toxic" or "cancerous" or whatever in
> technical discussions? (Unless we talk about toxic products or cancer
> treatment or similar.)
 
very much +1

I'm also very uncomfortable speaking about AIs similar like I don't like
the term IP=intellectual property...

AIs have no intelligence.


-- 
cheers,
	Holger

 ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
 ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁  holger@(debian|reproducible-builds|layer-acht).org
 ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀  OpenPGP: B8BF54137B09D35CF026FE9D 091AB856069AAA1C
 ⠈⠳⣄

I used to be scared for our grandchildren's future. Such optimism!
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 833 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=BUpG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.