Re: language (Re: Proposal -- Interpretation of DFSG on Artificial Intelligence (AI) Models)
Russ Allbery <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.devel.vote |
|---|---|
| Organization | The Eyrie |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
"Jonathan Dowland" <[email protected]> writes: > On Sun Apr 27, 2025 at 12:37 PM BST, Holger Levsen wrote: >> I'm also very uncomfortable speaking about AIs similar like I don't >> like the term IP=intellectual property... > It would be worthwhile to restrict ourselves to "LLM" for these things > since "AI" is a much broader term and many other technologies (past or > future) may be described as "AI" whilst not being LLMs. The GR as proposed would apply to a lot of things that are not LLMs, though. I think the right terminology for what we're currently talking about might be "machine learning model," which encompasses a wider set of onstructions from processed training data without limiting them to only large-language models.