Re: language (Re: Proposal -- Interpretation of DFSG on Artificial Intelligence (AI) Models)

Russ Allbery <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.debian.devel.vote
Organization The Eyrie
Message-ID <[email protected]>
"Jonathan Dowland" <[email protected]> writes:
> On Sun Apr 27, 2025 at 12:37 PM BST, Holger Levsen wrote:

>> I'm also very uncomfortable speaking about AIs similar like I don't 
>> like the term IP=intellectual property...

> It would be worthwhile to restrict ourselves to "LLM" for these things 
> since "AI" is a much broader term and many other technologies (past or 
> future) may be described as "AI" whilst not being LLMs.

The GR as proposed would apply to a lot of things that are not LLMs,
though. I think the right terminology for what we're currently talking
about might be "machine learning model," which encompasses a wider set of
onstructions from processed training data without limiting them to only
large-language models.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.