Re: [RFC] Counter-Proposal -- Interpretation of DFSG on Artificial Intelligence (AI) Models
Étienne Mollier <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.devel.vote |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Stephan, > Has there been an open discussion (e.g. on debian-devel or debian- > legal) of all the pros and cons and corner cases before specific > proposals have been put up for vote? There has been a stem of discussion on debian-devel[1], but not that many contribution to the thread compared to the present one on debian-vote. The topic also shown up several times over the past few years on debian-ai, although this mailing list may be a little more confidential than the ones you mention. [1]: https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2025/02/msg00015.html In hope this clarifies things, -- .''`. Étienne Mollier <[email protected]> : :' : pgp: 8f91 b227 c7d6 f2b1 948c 8236 793c f67e 8f0d 11da `. `' sent from /dev/pts/3, please excuse my verbosity `- on air: Yes - The Revealing Science Of God
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 833 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEj5GyJ8fW8rGUjII2eTz2fo8NEdoFAmgSahAACgkQeTz2fo8N EdrKZhAAkhBirlSYO5RUu0iXDNyfvYqHjTcC7i81Oie3vsLtGVX0xKRWTg5jnWBQ 3r/AHDY1atqe6xa1wMQY0wM1kf5WcfiWDR2Vyo5vYdV2bfGFGjNwGjgk+r/M4gAo mgviHgsDEsa+gVhsXFBKpTeVAvB2Qpm9Dx/xsn/067IHgkAqVwy4DmhZUyX7qlZx 6IM+EeQ1K02VIcmQGSbf6SdwPNp1In69PTMazm74vJ6V0ADwYjsebbEYOjn/vzxV OQE7eKKIHhXoqZcllXM9eVAHQ1OwR53FGXHh5WscAOyenrXj8VShkk9STgPMXbI9 yJeLU0/zgVqWdjx6Su2pSeDRx6NPKACXDZTuXEpmiKHd6nkePiPuoa8LVXfiny2g RhX7auiTCgWrVvM0sAbAQH0T3x6T4o1mhlx7viSs1Z/nvXgOUVvzziaYvPk/xlt8 Nxi13e3kMwDa31b1ylbsYk7kwA9fTbgS/0fHRF7WeHISovMeffEgE6kIFpcpGNUc 9PX5oeFmo171Gz/K77Eom+X7zj9VGjUDW5QyDMUvZiSQhIkqNT+H+AvT0jI6XM8L Z4HDjy7DC+aJKm3hSAagmdi/EL/S6TKCGQXBiFloh9XeFCC761lH4TGsdnKH/a8n C7399hXtmmQVquijoGB6q6TqQwMhKWOWa3kbFpwXoloG5spYaDs= =dAut -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----