Re: language (Re: Proposal -- Interpretation of DFSG on Artificial Intelligence (AI) Models)

Gunnar Wolf <[email protected]> wrote on 28/04/2025 at 19:10:35+0200:

> Russ Allbery dijo [Mon, Apr 28, 2025 at 09:46:41AM -0700]:
>>>> I'm also very uncomfortable speaking about AIs similar like I don't
>>>> like the term IP=intellectual property...
>>
>>> It would be worthwhile to restrict ourselves to "LLM" for these things
>>> since "AI" is a much broader term and many other technologies (past or
>>> future) may be described as "AI" whilst not being LLMs.
>>
>>The GR as proposed would apply to a lot of things that are not LLMs,
>>though. I think the right terminology for what we're currently talking
>>about might be "machine learning model," which encompasses a wider set of
>>onstructions from processed training data without limiting them to only
>>large-language models.
>
> This is an important point, which I subscribe. Since its inception over 60
> years ago, "Artificial Intelligence" is fluffy marketspeak […]

To me, it's actually quite accurate: the intelligence is totally
artificial. :D

-- 
PEB

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQJDBAEBCgAtFiEE5CQeth7uIW7ehIz87iFbn7jEWwsFAmgVRwgPHHBlYkBkZWJp
YW4ub3JnAAoJEO4hW5+4xFsLVa4QAMCbIwJOPVsuyYi0eY3J3y1ewJCtvBPFMOxN
IyQOGTUuzOmwPpwrBeuxsUDlNr7oRdR+smYBgxGhLjlN7dj97KIYUvwvK2qhvPhB
9ZDmvDC7yG6oNzO1Bvg+mQuT+i+Li1LiOvVIBL4/Rjqf8nmRGlORet8h87URyNGR
VRNWE22fDF0bsI5b5RrS2Z9ETV7gq5Xj0dpHFvYJR81rK3mzUK2Ru69RYPiv+Gmn
YwCDZuLAFoevc3ljH1SsscZgVg+kaX2GeOcGw4VBI52FVMtNAI2bafxK71g/SIkY
PCOJHj9TdFo+xtrDkQlXIhZc1wUmgpKeHaFBfdIUGaI466x1tuqO6WyGSwDHRBzA
yErY8XAD+SSlWjMvJS3qa9U1R4E/zdrfetfu5qdurOgcC7TF4pJNGbPMvJ56Hhux
0SC4l1d9/IlPr/F1GEgbk5KOrJ/SKTrBf13Mk6t91fJCp7fbohQwm/bzOMCCxngv
StTRt7pNGFU9Xx5TlyXNYDIzSgBOfItnIO5ti5sJlIysD42orOYfq+MSKZxbjo80
ceR1rKzx91aiVB/GpvTr0m1rE1h0hS1iSJ6UhxCZWP/nkC5OI6Jb6qILao1nUuoV
MWbyqazm+Nn2EtSqc5Pn2YSvA1sMVG2fKe2QHSZcLSGyE5cXW6++8NJ7hSGhy2yQ
r726juBW
=XNYG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----