Re: Proposal -- Interpretation of DFSG on Artificial Intelligence (AI) Models
Matthias Urlichs <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.devel.vote |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 04.05.25 14:27, Aigars Mahinovs wrote: > The simple fact that none of the LLMs have been sued out of > existence by *any *copyright owner is de facto proof that it does not > work that way in the eyes of the judicial system. That may or may not be correct in the long run, IANAL and all that. However. Copyright is only one aspect of whether or not models should end up in main. Plain old reproducibility is important to us too. If we can't include the training data, for obvious copyright reasons, then the question whether the resulting model itself is copyright-clean doesn't matter. -- -- regards -- -- Matthias Urlichs
matthias.vcf
(text/vcard, 195 B)
BEGIN:VCARD VERSION:4.0 N:Urlichs;Matthias;;; NICKNAME:Smurf EMAIL;PREF=1:[email protected] TEL;TYPE=work;VALUE=TEXT:+49 911 59818 0 URL;TYPE=home:https://matthias.urlichs.de END:VCARD
OpenPGP_signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 840 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- wsF5BAABCAAjFiEEr9eXgvO67AILKKGfcs+OXiW0wpMFAmgXarAFAwAAAAAACgkQcs+OXiW0wpOb wBAAjhtPrRpbmjJaSRhPlrZzbBxrzPdz804mS98WRb8D7A3+J6e2RVc7fFxRa9hiohzoQtbDRorZ x6EuaxRSzY0tac7W2tG1gPV58QvWJ0w7ypr6eraDLbu2pp+qFdWktiT2CRQ26hBxe22pD/KHE4YY AZ/crzGFfpFtz4Hz/SnxVe339Cu7RXBsAzZYXs0BFwv2qZqecs7ohmQ/+pOga5l1YyWpWHY7Uob2 qXvvH8Hg3EPTkYU1WT68It4Ozgv70L1khpa2rAMnNjXUPyg/arB0w4pha0+XpB3jUdeB7/1Dm0LG aFdXptdPZo/urv09ED/TOTdUcSvlw9vyOcFN7cNnM7Qk8VbDC6bSb2qhplg4fyPql5G7g0ylzzp2 7SCS6+xARVn8LtnYDJrrf3IkXDejCMcIk3TvG/KAbLBjGaU1vWUSGkZ8EmfqE5IlbBjM07CgKaB6 cYltMjF6FYblxWMpzJX5wv70TjZ8CAFph4+ZNmnT4Ta4g0wVlVJadkiXQDzcz5cACzR3cJ4AtRr4 /+n17bA1SU+ZnYlbmfjGF9p9XjVgTY26nSnrdl9Y8dRckAQvrzPqAsvD/PXJTJJndFzjW+QU0eCt Gk6YsWKtiMdL3J4sYkc/iOoe2VRMbXeuBf4+GOa+E1mItXPRwUHumH2UaKK8ZrWYWZloXFpEsWkK xGc= =Hxqz -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----