Re: Proposal -- Interpretation of DFSG on Artificial Intelligence (AI) Models
Sam Hartman <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.devel.vote |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
>>>>> "M" == M Zhou <[email protected]> writes: =================================== M> Proposal A: "AI models released under open source license without M> original training data or program" are not seen as M> DFSG-compliant. M> =============================================================================== M> The "AI models released under open source license without M> original training data or program", a particular type of files as I find the use of Open Source License in a Debian context problematic. The DFSG is not the OSD, and we should care whether a license is DFSG free not OSI approved. I hope that you would be willing to accept an amendment to replace all uses of open source in your proposal.
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 227 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHUEARYKAB0WIQSj2jRwbAdKzGY/4uAsbEw8qDeGdAUCaBkP4wAKCRAsbEw8qDeG dBxMAP0QiSTldlJd9gpDmDnrjgNYPYocoNC8LvJ0p9NJiE1G3wD/TZLH43WtfBbK knSTrBfsyPP2kSVdPHUOHWVuV0wKFQ0= =ipZX -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----