Re: Proposal -- Interpretation of DFSG on Artificial Intelligence (AI) Models

> > Wikipedia includes this citation:
> > "" However, many AI applications are not perceived as AI: "A lot of cutting
> > edge AI has filtered into general applications, often without being
> > called AI because once something becomes useful enough and common enough
> > it's not labeled AI anymore."[2][3] ""
> > <https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Artificial_intelligence&oldid=1286364868>
> 
> I agree with you. However, it is a term firmly set in the mind of too many
> people. 

But for how long ?

> Keep in mind Mo Zhou's proposal is in a large way an answer to
> OSI's OSAID⁴, which many among us feel to be a gross mistake.
> 
> ⁴ https://opensource.org/blog/the-open-source-initiative-announces-the-release-of-the-industrys-first-open-source-ai-definition
> 
> Too many people (both "in the trade" and not) recognize the term AI.

But in 5 years, they will associate AI to something quite different from today LLM,
but Debian will be stuck with this term in its policy documents, causing confusion.

Cheers,