Re: Proposal -- Interpretation of DFSG on Artificial Intelligence (AI) Models

On Mon, May 05, 2025 at 09:59:12PM -0400, M. Zhou wrote:
>Not likely. I'm the uploader of src:opencv.
>This is a pretty large library that contains lots of functionalities
>that does not require a "model" to function. For opencv, it is at
>most adding one more file for the +dfsg file exclusion, or spliting
>the model to maybe a non-free package and set Recommends to pull
>the package.

Is it possible that none of the packages that depend upon or
transitively build-depend upon opencv-data, including
libopencv-dev, don't actually depend upon any of the contents
of the opencv-data package?  If not, it seems to me that the
impact is much greater than what is implied above.