Re: Proposal -- Interpretation of DFSG on Artificial Intelligence (AI) Models

Le Tue, May 06, 2025 at 01:26:19AM +0200, Aigars Mahinovs a écrit :
> This one is much simpler. Maybe because the lawyers being used are not too
> good.
> 
> https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/67538258/tremblay-v-openai-inc/
> 
> Authors claim a lot of stuff, basically a generic shotgun of copyright
> claims, but all secondary claims get dismissed by the court at pre-trial
> stage due to bad legal reasoning and failing to detail or prove any actual
> wrongdoing. And specifically a claim that all outputs from a LLM are
> derived works of all inputs is dismissed based on already decided case law.
> 
> Only the claim of direct copyright infringement of using a text of a book
> in the training process of a model still stands to avait the actual trial.
> And there OpenAI is citing a lot of good reasons why that does not
> constitute distribution at all and why the result of the work is
> transformative and thus is protected by fair use. Just the fact of
> accessing some data at some point does not create copyright infringement.
> The whole lawsuit is very sloppy IMHO, IANAL.

If you want to know how the case is going, look at the second link I
provided (this is the same case).

Cheers,
Bill.