Re: Draft: Proposal Alternative: Traning data is not source code

On Wed, May 07, 2025 at 08:20:40AM -0600, Sam Hartman wrote:
>I am sad that it looks like there is not even support to put an option
>on the ballot that would empower our users to have a spam classifier in
>main.

I think there are pros and cons to having a spam classifier trained
on unincluded data in main, whether or not it's non-free data.  I
also think that voting on any of this is premature, and if a vote is
called anytime soon, I will be voting FD above all other options.