Re: Draft: Proposal Alternative: Traning data is not source code

Stefano Zacchiroli <[email protected]> Thu, 8 May 2025 17:40:34 +0300

Newsgroups	gmane.linux.debian.devel.vote
Message-ID	<[email protected]>

On Wed, May 07, 2025 at 08:20:40AM -0600, Sam Hartman wrote:
> Right now though, I don't see enough support for either my proposal or
> Aigars's proposal to move forward.  I am quite disappointed by that,
> because I think the current ballot option undermines part of the core
> of what software freedom is to me.

I think there might be support for at least one of those options, and
that people are just not paying attention very much to this discussion
right now, either because they are tired or because they are confused
about the timeline (I certainly am myself!).

Either way, having a single option would certainly be better than having
two, in terms of reaching the needed quorum for an alternative option to
be on the ballot. (Assuming you two are fine with "merging" the
proposals, of course.)

Cheers
-- 
Stefano Zacchiroli . [email protected] . https://upsilon.cc/zack  _. ^ ._
Full professor of Computer Science              o     o   o     \/|V|\/
Télécom Paris, Polytechnic Institute of Paris     o     o o    </>   <\>
Co-founder & CSO Software Heritage            o o o     o       /\|^|/\
Mastodon: https://mastodon.xyz/@zacchiro                        '" V "'

signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 833 B)