Re: withdrawing Proposal A -- Interpretation of DFSG on Artificial Intelligence (AI) Models

Russ Allbery <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.debian.devel.vote
Organization The Eyrie
Message-ID <[email protected]>
"M. Zhou" <[email protected]> writes:

> I decided to withdraw the proposal A: "AI models released under
> DFSG-compatible license without original training data or program" are
> not seen as DFSG-compliant.

> Based on the overall discussions and feedbacks, we as a community is
> underprepared to vote on this. Even if we vote, it is leading to a less
> convincing result. According to the constitution, I think it is
> completely fine to withdraw the proposal and cancel it temporarily, and
> get back when we are ready for it.

Thank you for all your work on this, and please don't consider this any
sort of fault on your part. This happens a lot; people don't really engage
until a GR is actually proposed, and even with the best of preparations,
sometimes that surfaces a bunch of opinions that didn't show up before
then.

I think this is the right decision and I also hope it doesn't discourage
you from continuing to work on this. I don't think anyone is saying that
we shouldn't have this conversation and a vote, only that we (myself very
much included) are realizing that we hadn't actually thought this through
as thoroughly as we had thought.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.